192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31223408)
1. Accuracy and precision of four main glucometers used in a Sub-Saharan African Country: a cross-sectional study.
Choukem SP; Sih C; Nebongo D; Tientcheu P; Kengne AP
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():118. PubMed ID: 31223408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hydroquinone-containing creams on capillary glycemia before and after serial hand washings in Africans.
Choukem SP; Efie DT; Djiogue S; Kaze FF; Mboue-Djieka Y; Boudjeko T; Dongo E; Gautier JF; Kengne AP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202271. PubMed ID: 30153255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of glucometers currently used in Sri Lanka.
Liyanage JH; Dissanayake HA; Gamage KKK; Keerthisena GSP; Ihalagama IRHS; Weeratunga PN; Wijesundara WA; Wijetunga WMUA; Subasinghe S; Tilakaratne TAD; Katulanda GW; Katulanda P
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2019; 13(3):2184-2188. PubMed ID: 31235155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of i-SENS glucometers in neonates using capillary blood samples.
Kim HN; Yoon SY
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 33915605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters.
Ghys T; Goedhuys W; Spincemaille K; Gorus F; Gerlo E
Clin Chim Acta; 2007; 386(1-2):63-8. PubMed ID: 17727831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Accuracy of Different Glucometers Based on the Laboratory Reference Method.
Al-Zahrani A; Alshareef R; Farahat F; Borai A
Clin Lab; 2020 Oct; 66(10):. PubMed ID: 33073954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The analytical quality and comparability value of four glucometers from different manufacturers].
Horovskaia LA; Lobachevskaia TV; Chernichuk OV
Klin Lab Diagn; 2015 Jan; 60(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 25874308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance evaluation of three i-SENS glucometers using arterial blood samples compared with the YSI 2300 Glucose Analyzer.
Kim HN; Moon KC; Yoon SY
J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Aug; 34(8):e23356. PubMed ID: 32430994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing: Post-Market Performance Assessment of the Accu-Chek Inform II Hospital-Use Glucose Meter].
Petryaykina EE; Mayanskiy NA; Demina ES; Karamysheva IV; Gorst KA; Timofeev AV
Ter Arkh; 2023 Dec; 95(12):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 38785055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Precision of Measured Blood Sugar Values by Three Glucometers Compared to the Standard Technique.
Kermani SK; Khatony A; Jalali R; Rezaei M; Abdi A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):OC05-OC08. PubMed ID: 28571181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients.
Hoedemaekers CW; Klein Gunnewiek JM; Prinsen MA; Willems JL; Van der Hoeven JG
Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3062-6. PubMed ID: 18824915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the OneTouch® Delica™: a low-pain lancing system for self-monitoring of blood glucose.
Ginsberg BH; Shemain A; Pines MK; Wallace DA; Pineau M
Postgrad Med; 2011 Jul; 123(4):92-8. PubMed ID: 21680993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters.
Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Pereira AJ; Corrêa TD; de Almeida FP; Deliberato RO; Lobato Mdos S; Akamine N; Silva E; Cavalcanti AB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129568. PubMed ID: 26067093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurement by glucometers compared to venous blood glucose in critically ill patients: A facility based cross-sectional study.
Chandra Prabhakar M; Halder P
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2024 Apr; 60():24-30. PubMed ID: 38479916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
