These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31225777)

  • 1. Verbal Quantifiers and Communicating Painkiller Side Effect Risk.
    Cox JG
    Health Commun; 2020 Oct; 35(11):1349-1358. PubMed ID: 31225777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating the risk of side effects to patients: an evaluation of UK regulatory recommendations.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Woolf E; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; McMillan B
    Drug Saf; 2009; 32(10):837-49. PubMed ID: 19722727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People's Understanding of Verbal Risk Descriptors in Patient Information Leaflets: A Cross-Sectional National Survey of 18- to 65-Year-Olds in England.
    Webster RK; Weinman J; Rubin GJ
    Drug Saf; 2017 Aug; 40(8):743-754. PubMed ID: 28497250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined verbal and numerical expressions increase perceived risk of medicine side-effects: a randomized controlled trial of EMA recommendations.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Woolf E
    Health Expect; 2016 Apr; 19(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 25645270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Focus to an attribute with verbal or numerical quantifiers affects the attribute framing effect.
    Liu D; Juanchich M; Sirota M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103088. PubMed ID: 32497741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different.
    Feiman R; Snedeker J
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():29-52. PubMed ID: 27214380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intuitive use of contextual information in decisions made with verbal and numerical quantifiers.
    Liu D; Juanchich M; Sirota M; Orbell S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):481-494. PubMed ID: 31952448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scale structure: processing minimum standard and maximum standard scalar adjectives.
    Frazier L; Clifton C; Stolterfoht B
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):299-324. PubMed ID: 17376422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communicating information concerning potential medication harms and benefits: What gist do numbers convey?
    Blalock SJ; Sage A; Bitonti M; Patel P; Dickinson R; Knapp P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Dec; 99(12):1964-1970. PubMed ID: 27444232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Including Quantitative Information on Multiple Endpoints in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Advertisements.
    Sullivan HW; O'Donoghue AC; Lynch M; Johnson M; Davis C; Rupert DJ
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Nov; 39(8):975-985. PubMed ID: 31583947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Saudi young patient understanding of information about side effects: Verbal versus numerical expression.
    Al Juffali L; Al Omran O; Al Aqeel S
    Saudi Pharm J; 2014 Jan; 22(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24493971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient information website: a study of the use of verbal descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies.
    Knapp P; Gardner PH; Carrigan N; Raynor DK; Woolf E
    Br J Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 14(Pt 3):579-94. PubMed ID: 18992183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To what extent do politeness expectations shape risk perception? Even numerical probabilities are under their spell!
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Nov; 141(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 23098906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energetic arousal and language: predictions from the computational theory of quantifiers processing.
    Zajenkowski M
    Hum Factors; 2013 Oct; 55(5):924-34. PubMed ID: 24218902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of verbal and numerical quantifiers on questionnaire responses.
    Hartley J; Trueman M; Rodgers A
    Appl Ergon; 1984 Jun; 15(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 15676514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Riskier than we think? The relationship between risk statement completeness and perceptions of direct to consumer advertised prescription drugs.
    Davis JJ
    J Health Commun; 2000; 5(4):349-69. PubMed ID: 11191018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines.
    Knapp P; Raynor DK; Berry DC
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 15175486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do dissonant ad visuals cause consumers to discount prescription drug side effects?
    Hagenbuch D
    Health Mark Q; 2019; 36(4):337-353. PubMed ID: 31646956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifier processing can be dissociated from numerical processing: evidence from semantic dementia patients.
    Cheng D; Zhou A; Yu X; Chen C; Jia J; Zhou X
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2172-83. PubMed ID: 23867350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.