These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31225818)

  • 41. An evidence-based algorithm for intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implantation.
    Cosetti MK; Troob SH; Latzman JM; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 22222576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Device Testing Utilizing an Automated Remote System: A Prospective Pilot Study.
    Lohmann AR; Carlson ML; Sladen DP
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):313-317. PubMed ID: 29342050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Surgical approach for complete cochlear coverage in EAS-patients after residual hearing loss.
    Weiss NM; Dhanasingh A; Schraven SP; Schulze M; Langner S; Mlynski R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223121. PubMed ID: 31557251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impedance, neural response telemetry, and speech perception outcomes after reimplantation of cochlear implants in children.
    Birman CS; Sanli H; Gibson WP; Elliott EJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1385-93. PubMed ID: 24662639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.
    Tamames I; King C; Bas E; Dietrich WD; Telischi F; Rajguru SM
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():32-9. PubMed ID: 27260269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients.
    de Rijk SR; Boys AJ; Roberts IV; Jiang C; Garcia C; Owens RM; Bance M
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2023 Sep; 12(24):e2300732. PubMed ID: 37310792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
    Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of Implantation and Reimplantation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in an In Vivo Animal Experimental Model (Macaca fascicularis).
    de Abajo J; Manrique-Huarte R; Sanhueza I; Alvarez-Gómez L; Zulueta-Santos C; Calavia D; Ramírez F; Manrique M
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e57-e68. PubMed ID: 27556522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation.
    Saoji AA; Adkins WJ; Olund AP; Graham M; Patel NS; Neff BA; Carlson ML; Driscoll CLW
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Nov; 59(11):881-888. PubMed ID: 32749178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Identification and revision of a displaced cochlear implant electrode in the internal auditory canal.
    Todt I; Rademacher G; Ernst A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Sep; 14(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 23510683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cochlear implants: Insertion assessment by computed tomography.
    Menegatti Pavan AL; Alves AFF; Giacomini G; Altemani JMC; Castilho AM; Lauria RA; da Silva VAR; Guimarães AC; de Pina DR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 29685378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig.
    Honeder C; Ahmadi N; Kramer AM; Zhu C; Saidov N; Arnoldner C
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Jun; (136):. PubMed ID: 29985368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Damage to inner ear structure during cochlear implantation: Correlation between insertion force and radio-histological findings in temporal bone specimens.
    De Seta D; Torres R; Russo FY; Ferrary E; Kazmitcheff G; Heymann D; Amiaud J; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Nguyen Y
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():90-97. PubMed ID: 27825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
    Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [The analysis of the electrode impedance in different periods after cochlear implantation performed with round window insertion in steroid deposition].
    Zhong KB; Wang XQ; Ge RM; Huang HM; Zeng J; Wu PN
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 31(13):988-990. PubMed ID: 29798159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. New window for cochlear implant insertion.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 10320079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
    Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.