255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31225916)
41. Is the Effect Assessment Approach for Fungicides as Laid Down in the European Food Safety Authority Aquatic Guidance Document Sufficiently Protective for Freshwater Ecosystems?
Rico A; Brock TCM; Daam MA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Oct; 38(10):2279-2293. PubMed ID: 31211455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Review of the Environmental Fate and Effects of Acesulfame-Potassium.
Belton K; Schaefer E; Guiney PD
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Jun; 16(4):421-437. PubMed ID: 32065497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comprehensive characterization of the acute and chronic toxicity of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam to a suite of aquatic primary producers, invertebrates, and fish.
Finnegan MC; Baxter LR; Maul JD; Hanson ML; Hoekstra PF
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2838-2848. PubMed ID: 28493485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Environmental risk assessment of paroxetine.
Cunningham VL; Constable DJ; Hannah RE
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jun; 38(12):3351-9. PubMed ID: 15260335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Recommendations for Improving Methods and Models for Aquatic Hazard Assessment of Ionizable Organic Chemicals.
Escher BI; Abagyan R; Embry M; Klüver N; Redman AD; Zarfl C; Parkerton TF
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Feb; 39(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 31569266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Aquatic toxicity and ecological risk assessment of seven parabens: Individual and additive approach.
Yamamoto H; Tamura I; Hirata Y; Kato J; Kagota K; Katsuki S; Yamamoto A; Kagami Y; Tatarazako N
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Dec; 410-411():102-11. PubMed ID: 22051549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Applying adverse outcome pathways and species sensitivity-weighted distribution to predicted-no-effect concentration derivation and quantitative ecological risk assessment for bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in aquatic environments: A case study on Tianjin City, China.
Wang Y; Na G; Zong H; Ma X; Yang X; Mu J; Wang L; Lin Z; Zhang Z; Wang J; Zhao J
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Feb; 37(2):551-562. PubMed ID: 28984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prioritization and analysis of pharmaceuticals for human use contaminating the aquatic ecosystem in Italy.
Riva F; Zuccato E; Castiglioni S
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2015 Mar; 106():71-8. PubMed ID: 25459268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Four selected high molecular weight heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Ecotoxicological hazard assessment, environmental relevance and regulatory needs under REACH.
Brendel S; Polleichtner C; Behnke A; Jessel S; Hassold E; Jennemann C; Einhenkel-Arle D; Seidel A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Nov; 163():340-348. PubMed ID: 30059878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Toxicities of 48 pharmaceuticals and their freshwater and marine environmental assessment in northwestern France.
Minguez L; Pedelucq J; Farcy E; Ballandonne C; Budzinski H; Halm-Lemeille MP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Mar; 23(6):4992-5001. PubMed ID: 25292303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Triclosan: its occurrence, fate and effects in the Australian environment.
Kookana RS; Ying GG; Waller NJ
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 21330702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Are we going about chemical risk assessment for the aquatic environment the wrong way?
Johnson AC; Sumpter JP
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1609-16. PubMed ID: 27331653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Risk screening of pharmaceutical compounds in Romanian aquatic environment.
Gheorghe S; Petre J; Lucaciu I; Stoica C; Nita-Lazar M
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jun; 188(6):379. PubMed ID: 27234514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the European Union: A case study with the β-blocker atenolol.
Küster A; Alder AC; Escher BI; Duis K; Fenner K; Garric J; Hutchinson TH; Lapen DR; Péry A; Römbke J; Snape J; Ternes T; Topp E; Wehrhan A; Knacker T
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6 Suppl():514-23. PubMed ID: 19886730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Environmental risk assessment for the widely used iodinated X-ray contrast agent iopromide (Ultravist).
Steger-Hartmann T; Länge R; Schweinfurth H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1999 Mar; 42(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 10090816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Presence, fate and effects of the intense sweetener sucralose in the aquatic environment.
Tollefsen KE; Nizzetto L; Huggett DB
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 438():510-6. PubMed ID: 23032567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Environmental exposure and risk assessment of fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents in wastewater and river water of the Glatt Valley Watershed, Switzerland.
Golet EM; Alder AC; Giger W
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Sep; 36(17):3645-51. PubMed ID: 12322733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive.
von der Ohe PC; Dulio V; Slobodnik J; De Deckere E; Kühne R; Ebert RU; Ginebreda A; De Cooman W; Schüürmann G; Brack W
Sci Total Environ; 2011 May; 409(11):2064-77. PubMed ID: 21414651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The influence of particles on bioavailability and toxicity of pesticides in surface water.
Knauer K; Homazava N; Junghans M; Werner I
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):585-600. PubMed ID: 27862913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
