These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226004)

  • 1. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Voids in Class II Composite Resin Restorations by Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Pardo Díaz CA; Shimokawa C; Sampaio CS; Freitas AZ; Turbino ML
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31226004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
    Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal Adaptation of Cusp-weakened Class I Preparations Restored with Bulk-fill, Bi-layered, and Incremental Restorative Techniques: A Micro-CT Analysis.
    Floriani DH; Rached RN; Ignácio SA; Souza EM
    Oper Dent; 2022 Sep; 47(5):527-534. PubMed ID: 36121720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis.
    Sampaio CS; Fernández Arias J; Atria PJ; Cáceres E; Pardo Díaz C; Freitas AZ; Hirata R
    Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1568-1575. PubMed ID: 31500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Time Required and Internal Adaptation in Cavities restored with Bulk-fill Composites.
    Vianna-de-Pinho MG; Rego GF; Vidal ML; Alonso RCB; Schneider LFJ; Cavalcante LM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 29208783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
    Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
    de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Adjacent Tooth Type and Occlusal Fatigue on Proximal Contact Force of Posterior Bulk Fill and Incremental Resin Composite Restoration.
    Oliveira L; Melo C; Cavalcanti K; Soares P; Cardenas A; Soares CJ
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 35090036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of Shrinkage and Viscosity of Flowable Composite Liners on Cervical Microleakage of Class II Restorations: A Micro-CT Analysis.
    Nie J; Yap AU; Wang XY
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 30142038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the Combination of Restorative Material and the Etching Protocol in Enamel Microleakage in Class II Cavities after Thermocycling.
    Dutra NMS; Baroudi K; Silva ASF; Laxe LAC; da Silva Concilio LR; Tribst JPM; Salvio LA
    Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():1354738. PubMed ID: 36820225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
    Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations.
    Shim JS; Li CY; Won JE; Ryu JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):764.e1-764.e7. PubMed ID: 36309470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture strength of extended class I composite restorations with different restorative techniques.
    Leyton BS; Rached RN; Ignácio SA; Souza EM
    Odontology; 2022 Apr; 110(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 34519962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E32-E42. PubMed ID: 31738696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of composite resin restoration radiopacity on radiographic diagnosis and decision-making.
    Canto JDA; de Mendonça LS; de Arruda JAA; Alvares PR; Moreno A; Pontual MLA; da Silveira MMF
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(5):72-76. PubMed ID: 31454328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.