BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226367)

  • 1. Mathematical modeling of the heterogeneous distributions of nanomedicines in solid tumors.
    He H; Liu C; Liu Y; Liu X; Wu Y; Fan J; Zhao L; Cao Y
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2019 Sep; 142():153-164. PubMed ID: 31226367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation.
    Luan X; Yuan H; Song Y; Hu H; Wen B; He M; Zhang H; Li Y; Li F; Shu P; Burnett JP; Truchan N; Palmisano M; Pai MP; Zhou S; Gao W; Sun D
    Biomaterials; 2021 Aug; 275():120910. PubMed ID: 34144373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spatiotemporal journey of nanomedicines in solid tumors on their therapeutic efficacy.
    Qin M; Xia H; Xu W; Chen B; Wang Y
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2023 Dec; 203():115137. PubMed ID: 37949414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Influencing the Delivery Efficiency of Cancer Nanomedicines.
    Ullah R; Wazir J; Khan FU; Diallo MT; Ihsan AU; Mikrani R; Aquib M; Zhou X
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2020 May; 21(4):132. PubMed ID: 32409932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right.
    Sun D; Zhou S; Gao W
    ACS Nano; 2020 Oct; 14(10):12281-12290. PubMed ID: 33021091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-resolution 3D visualization of nanomedicine distribution in tumors.
    Moss JI; Barjat H; Emmas SA; Strittmatter N; Maynard J; Goodwin RJA; Storm G; Lammers T; Puri S; Ashford MB; Barry ST
    Theranostics; 2020; 10(2):880-897. PubMed ID: 31903157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcytosis-enabled active extravasation of tumor nanomedicine.
    Zhou Q; Li J; Xiang J; Shao S; Zhou Z; Tang J; Shen Y
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Oct; 189():114480. PubMed ID: 35952830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design considerations for nanotherapeutics in oncology.
    Stylianopoulos T; Jain RK
    Nanomedicine; 2015 Nov; 11(8):1893-907. PubMed ID: 26282377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeting Brain Tumors with Nanomedicines: Overcoming Blood Brain Barrier Challenges.
    Khaitan D; Reddy PL; Ningaraj N
    Curr Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 13(2):110-119. PubMed ID: 29651960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor extravasation and infiltration as barriers of nanomedicine for high efficacy: The current status and transcytosis strategy.
    Zhou Q; Dong C; Fan W; Jiang H; Xiang J; Qiu N; Piao Y; Xie T; Luo Y; Li Z; Liu F; Shen Y
    Biomaterials; 2020 May; 240():119902. PubMed ID: 32105817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Systems Pharmacology Model for Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors by Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Implications for Bystander Effects.
    Burton JK; Bottino D; Secomb TW
    AAPS J; 2019 Dec; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 31828446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the dynamics and heterogeneity of the EPR effect: pathophysiological and pathoanatomic features, drug formulations and physicochemical factors.
    Islam R; Maeda H; Fang J
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2022 Feb; 19(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 33430661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological rationale for the design of polymeric anti-cancer nanomedicines.
    Zhou Y; Kopeček J
    J Drug Target; 2013 Jan; 21(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 23009337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tumor targeting via EPR: Strategies to enhance patient responses.
    Golombek SK; May JN; Theek B; Appold L; Drude N; Kiessling F; Lammers T
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2018 May; 130():17-38. PubMed ID: 30009886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulating tumor mechanics with nanomedicine for cancer therapy.
    Zhao Q; Chen J; Zhang Z; Xiao C; Zeng H; Xu C; Yang X; Li Z
    Biomater Sci; 2023 Jun; 11(13):4471-4489. PubMed ID: 37221958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced permeability and retention effect-focused tumor-targeted nanomedicines: latest trends, obstacles and future perspective.
    Shekhar S; Chauhan M; Sonali ; Yadav B; Dutt R; Hu L; Muthu MS; Singh RP
    Nanomedicine (Lond); 2022 Aug; 17(18):1213-1216. PubMed ID: 36136592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using imaging modalities to predict nanoparticle distribution and treatment efficacy in solid tumors: The growing role of ultrasound.
    Cooley MB; Wegierak D; Exner AA
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2024; 16(2):e1957. PubMed ID: 38558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies to enhance drug delivery to solid tumors by harnessing the EPR effects and alternative targeting mechanisms.
    Zi Y; Yang K; He J; Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang W
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2022 Sep; 188():114449. PubMed ID: 35835353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Platinum-based combination nanomedicines for cancer therapy.
    Li Y; Lin W
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2023 Jun; 74():102290. PubMed ID: 36989943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stromal barriers and strategies for the delivery of nanomedicine to desmoplastic tumors.
    Miao L; Lin CM; Huang L
    J Control Release; 2015 Dec; 219():192-204. PubMed ID: 26277065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.