148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226555)
1. Comparing flow cytometry with culture-based methods for microbial monitoring and as a diagnostic tool for assessing drinking water treatment processes.
Cheswick R; Cartmell E; Lee S; Upton A; Weir P; Moore G; Nocker A; Jefferson B; Jarvis P
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104893. PubMed ID: 31226555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the suitability of online flow cytometry for monitoring full-scale drinking water ozone system disinfection effectiveness.
Dowdell KS; Olsen K; Martinez Paz EF; Sun A; Keown J; Lahr R; Steglitz B; Busch A; LiPuma JJ; Olson T; Raskin L
Water Res; 2024 Jun; 257():121702. PubMed ID: 38749337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring.
Van Nevel S; Koetzsch S; Proctor CR; Besmer MD; Prest EI; Vrouwenvelder JS; Knezev A; Boon N; Hammes F
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():191-206. PubMed ID: 28214393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method.
Prest EI; Hammes F; Kötzsch S; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7131-42. PubMed ID: 24183559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing microbiological water quality in drinking water distribution systems with disinfectant residual using flow cytometry.
Gillespie S; Lipphaus P; Green J; Parsons S; Weir P; Juskowiak K; Jefferson B; Jarvis P; Nocker A
Water Res; 2014 Nov; 65():224-34. PubMed ID: 25123436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for microbiological quality assessment in drinking water: a comparative study.
Helmi K; Barthod F; Méheut G; Henry A; Poty F; Laurent F; Charni-Ben-Tabassi N
J Water Health; 2015 Mar; 13(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25719463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining flow cytometry and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing: a promising approach for drinking water monitoring and characterization.
Prest EI; El-Chakhtoura J; Hammes F; Saikaly PE; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():179-89. PubMed ID: 25000200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Bacterial Dynamics in a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System.
Prest EI; Weissbrodt DG; Hammes F; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164445. PubMed ID: 27792739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes.
Hammes F; Berney M; Wang Y; Vital M; Köster O; Egli T
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17659762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Improving the standard and methodological basis for bacteriological monitoring the quality of drinking water].
Nedachin AE; Artemova TZ; Ivanova LV; Talaeva IuG; Bogatyreva IA; Butorina NN; Zagaĭnova AV
Gig Sanit; 2007; (5):36-9. PubMed ID: 18050700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological instability in a chlorinated drinking water distribution network.
Nescerecka A; Rubulis J; Vital M; Juhna T; Hammes F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96354. PubMed ID: 24796923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow cytometry total cell counts: a field study assessing microbiological water quality and growth in unchlorinated drinking water distribution systems.
Liu G; Van der Mark EJ; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():595872. PubMed ID: 23819117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of DNA extraction yield from a chlorinated drinking water distribution system.
Putri RE; Kim LH; Farhat N; Felemban M; Saikaly PE; Vrouwenvelder JS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253799. PubMed ID: 34166448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of disinfectant residual on the interaction between bacterial growth and assimilable organic carbon in a drinking water distribution system.
Li W; Zhang J; Wang F; Qian L; Zhou Y; Qi W; Chen J
Chemosphere; 2018 Jul; 202():586-597. PubMed ID: 29597176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of enhanced assimilable organic carbon method across operational drinking water systems.
Pick FC; Fish KE; Biggs CA; Moses JP; Moore G; Boxall JB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225477. PubMed ID: 31809502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of biofilm cell quantification methods for drinking water distribution systems.
Waller SA; Packman AI; Hausner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():8-21. PubMed ID: 29111400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometry and adenosine tri-phosphate analysis: alternative possibilities to evaluate major bacteriological changes in drinking water treatment and distribution systems.
Vital M; Dignum M; Magic-Knezev A; Ross P; Rietveld L; Hammes F
Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(15):4665-76. PubMed ID: 22763289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of assimilable organic carbon and free chlorine on bacterial growth in drinking water.
Liu X; Wang J; Liu T; Kong W; He X; Jin Y; Zhang B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128825. PubMed ID: 26034988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow cytometry for immediate follow-up of drinking water networks after maintenance.
Van Nevel S; Buysschaert B; De Roy K; De Gusseme B; Clement L; Boon N
Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():66-73. PubMed ID: 28043001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytometric methods for measuring bacteria in water: advantages, pitfalls and applications.
Hammes F; Egli T
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2010 Jun; 397(3):1083-95. PubMed ID: 20352197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
