These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226934)

  • 1. Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes.
    Vickerstaff V; Omar RZ; Ambler G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 31226934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of methods for analysing multiple outcome measures in randomised controlled trials using a simulation study.
    Vickerstaff V; Ambler G; Omar RZ
    Biom J; 2021 Mar; 63(3):599-615. PubMed ID: 33314364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recommendations for the analysis of individually randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm - a case of continuous outcomes.
    Flight L; Allison A; Dimairo M; Lee E; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):165. PubMed ID: 27899073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power difference in a χ
    Miller ML; Roe DJ; Hu C; Bell ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):50. PubMed ID: 32122312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.
    Teare MD; Dimairo M; Shephard N; Hayman A; Whitehead A; Walters SJ
    Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():264. PubMed ID: 24993581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.
    Baio G; Copas A; Ambler G; Hargreaves J; Beard E; Omar RZ
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():354. PubMed ID: 26282553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes and statistical power in adult critical care randomized trials.
    Harhay MO; Wagner J; Ratcliffe SJ; Bronheim RS; Gopal A; Green S; Cooney E; Mikkelsen ME; Kerlin MP; Small DS; Halpern SD
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2014 Jun; 189(12):1469-78. PubMed ID: 24786714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Performances of Multiple Comparison Methods in Commonly Used 2 × C Contingency Tables.
    Cangur S; Ankarali H; Pasin O
    Interdiscip Sci; 2016 Dec; 8(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 26454649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal weighted Bonferroni tests and their graphical extensions.
    Xi D; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 38073604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Missing data and sensitivity analysis for binary data with implications for sample size and power of randomized clinical trials.
    Cook T; Zea R
    Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 31726480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures.
    Kang G; Ye K; Liu N; Allison DB; Gao G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article23. PubMed ID: 19409067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.
    Morden JP; Lambert PC; Latimer N; Abrams KR; Wailoo AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():4. PubMed ID: 21223539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
    Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.