These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226934)

  • 21. Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?
    Hernández AV; Eijkemans MJ; Steyerberg EW
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16275011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.
    Copas AJ; Hooper R
    Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31580144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial - the development of the DELTA
    Sones W; Julious SA; Rothwell JC; Ramsay CR; Hampson LV; Emsley R; Walters SJ; Hewitt C; Bland M; Fergusson DA; Berlin JA; Altman D; Vale LD; Cook JA
    Trials; 2018 Oct; 19(1):542. PubMed ID: 30305155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
    Savović J; Jones H; Altman D; Harris R; Jűni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk E; Gluud C; Gluud L; Ioannidis J; Schulz K; Beynon R; Welton N; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks J; Sterne J
    Health Technol Assess; 2012 Sep; 16(35):1-82. PubMed ID: 22989478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Randomized Controlled Trials 6: Determining the Sample Size and Power for Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.
    Greene T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():281-305. PubMed ID: 33871850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.
    Raad H; Cornelius V; Chan S; Williamson E; Cro S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 32293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Baseline characteristics and statistical power in randomized controlled trials: selection, prognostic targeting, or covariate adjustment?
    Roozenbeek B; Maas AI; Lingsma HF; Butcher I; Lu J; Marmarou A; McHugh GS; Weir J; Murray GD; Steyerberg EW;
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Oct; 37(10):2683-90. PubMed ID: 19885979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.
    Jakobsen JC; Gluud C; Winkel P; Lange T; Wetterslev J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24588900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Power and sample size calculations for discrete bounded outcome scores.
    Tsonaka R; Rizopoulos D; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4241-52. PubMed ID: 16947202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample size calculations for evaluating treatment policies in multi-stage designs.
    Dawson R; Lavori PW
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):643-52. PubMed ID: 20630903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size and power calculations based on generalized linear mixed models with correlated binary outcomes.
    Dang Q; Mazumdar S; Houck PR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Aug; 91(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 18462826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA
    Cook JA; Julious SA; Sones W; Hampson LV; Hewitt C; Berlin JA; Ashby D; Emsley R; Fergusson DA; Walters SJ; Wilson EC; MacLennan G; Stallard N; Rothwell JC; Bland M; Brown L; Ramsay CR; Cook A; Armstrong D; Altman D; Vale LD
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(60):1-88. PubMed ID: 31661431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.
    Heo M; Kim N; Rinke ML; Wylie-Rosett J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 26988927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
    Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study.
    Xiao L; Lavori PW; Wilson SR; Ma J
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21335590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A four-step strategy for handling missing outcome data in randomised trials affected by a pandemic.
    Cro S; Morris TP; Kahan BC; Cornelius VR; Carpenter JR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):208. PubMed ID: 32787782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in clinical trials: A follow-up simulation study.
    Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Morden JP; Crowther MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):765-784. PubMed ID: 27114326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.