BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31226960)

  • 21. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial.
    de Groot EM; van der Horst S; Kingma BF; Goense L; van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Weksler B; Sharma P; Moudgill N; Chojnacki KA; Rosato EL
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 21899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
    Chiu PW; Teoh AY; Wong VW; Yip HC; Chan SM; Wong SK; Ng EK
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 27783358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous esophageal cancer.
    Yip HC; Shirakawa Y; Cheng CY; Huang CL; Chiu PWY
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 Dec; 1482(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 32783237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
    Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
    Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.
    Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Why pay more for robot in esophageal cancer surgery?
    Rebecchi F; Ugliono E; Allaix ME; Morino M
    Updates Surg; 2023 Feb; 75(2):367-372. PubMed ID: 35953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.
    Sarkaria IS; Rizk NP; Goldman DA; Sima C; Tan KS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Molena D; Bott M; Atkinson T; Jones DR; Rusch VW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 108(3):920-928. PubMed ID: 31026433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
    Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
    World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early outcomes with robot-assisted vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies.
    Huang Y; Zhao YL; Song JD
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Dec; 25(24):7887-7897. PubMed ID: 34982451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
    Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and feasible for treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Ma S; Yan T; Liu D; Wang K; Wang J; Song J; Wang T; He W; Bai J; Jin L; Chen X
    Thorac Cancer; 2018 Feb; 9(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 29319236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Chao YK; Li ZG; Wen YW; Kim DJ; Park SY; Chang YL; van der Sluis PC; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
    Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):346. PubMed ID: 31182150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.