These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31227137)

  • 1. Validity Assessment in Traumatic Brain Injury Impairment and Disability Evaluations.
    Zasler ND; Bender SD
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 Aug; 30(3):621-636. PubMed ID: 31227137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical guidelines in the use of symptom validity and other psychological tests to measure malingering and symptom exaggeration in traumatic brain injury cases.
    Etcoff LM; Kampfer KM
    Neuropsychol Rev; 1996 Dec; 6(4):171-201. PubMed ID: 9159771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of validity and response bias in neuropsychiatric evaluations.
    Wygant DB; Granacher RP
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2015; 36(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 26409491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity assessment and the neurological physical examination.
    Zasler ND
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2015; 36(4):401-13. PubMed ID: 26409489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not just malingering: syndrome diagnosis in traumatic brain injury litigation.
    Miller L
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 11568469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of Victoria Symptom Validity Test Cutoff Scores among Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Litigants Using a Known-Groups Design.
    Silk-Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 May; 31(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 26795609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Insufficient cooperativeness in forensic neuropsychiatric assessment: prevalence estimates of negative response bias].
    Merten T; Friedel E; Stevens A
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2006 Mar; 58(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 16553222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicolegal Issues in Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Zasler ND; Bigler E
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2017 May; 28(2):379-391. PubMed ID: 28390520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury.
    Bianchini KJ; Greve KW; Love JM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Nov; 17(4):574-80. PubMed ID: 15168921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PATHOLOGIC MALINGERING. THE PAINFUL DISABLED EXTREMITY.
    SHAW RS
    N Engl J Med; 1964 Jul; 271():22-6. PubMed ID: 14148225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The factor structure of the Disability Rating Scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
    Krch D; Lequerica AH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 28942681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malingering assessment after severe traumatic brain injury in forensic psychology with a potential embedded symptom validity indicator of Symptom Checklist 90.
    Liu C; Lu Q; Rao G; Chen X; Liang M; Liu Z
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1320636. PubMed ID: 38390415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of effort level, exaggeration, and malingering in neurocognitive assessment.
    Lynch WJ
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2004; 19(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15247849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessment of malingering and dissimulation in the examination of subjects with mental and psychosomatic disorders].
    Dohrenbusch R; Henningsen R; Merten T
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2011 Jun; 63(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 21698944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Red flags in the clinical interview may forecast invalid neuropsychological testing.
    Keesler ME; McClung K; Meredith-Duliba T; Williams K; Swirsky-Sacchetti T
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 31(3):619-631. PubMed ID: 27846775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategies of successful and unsuccessful simulators coached to feign traumatic brain injury.
    Kanser RJ; Rapport LJ; Bashem JR; Billings NM; Hanks RA; Axelrod BN; Miller JB
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 31(3):644-653. PubMed ID: 28084893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric validity assessment.
    Kirkwood MW
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2015; 36(4):439-50. PubMed ID: 26409492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost of malingering mild traumatic brain injury-related cognitive deficits during compensation and pension evaluations in the veterans benefits administration.
    Denning JH; Shura RD
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical Evaluation Board Involvement, Non-Credible Cognitive Testing, and Emotional Response Bias in Concussed Service Members.
    Mooney SR; Stafford J; Seats E
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e546-e554. PubMed ID: 29590406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.