168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31227233)
1. Evaluation of a shape memory implant abutment system: An up to 6-month pilot clinical study.
Shah KC; Linsley CS; Wu BM
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 31227233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the wear and retention performance of a shape-memory alloy abutment system after 6 months of clinical use.
Linsley CS; Chesnot P; Shah KC; Wu BM; Park J; Seo YR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 31780105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
Urdaneta RA; Marincola M; Weed M; Chuang SK
J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Current Perspective on Screw-Retained Single-Implant Restorations: A Review of Pertinent Literature.
Priest G
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 May; 29(3):161-171. PubMed ID: 28112854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
Drago CJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
Torrado E; Ercoli C; Al Mardini M; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Cordaro L
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis.
Hosseini M; Worsaae N; Schiødt M; Gotfredsen K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1078-87. PubMed ID: 22708959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interim restoration using dynamic abutments to re-treat a single-implant crown with a labial angulation: A clinical report.
Gómez-Polo M; Gómez-Polo C; Celemín A; Ortega R
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):791-795. PubMed ID: 29807738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cementing an Implant Crown: A Novel Measurement System Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach.
Wadhwani C; Goodwin S; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 25196982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses.
Rammelsberg P; Bernhart G; Lorenzo Bermejo J; Schmitter M; Schwarz S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):813-8. PubMed ID: 23730776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of the Straumann Bone Level Implant system for anterior single-tooth replacements in augmented and nonaugmented sites: a prospective cohort study with 60 consecutive patients.
Santing HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; den Hartog L; Meijer HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 22540833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
