These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31227235)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Two Facebow/Semi-adjustable Articulator Systems for Orienting Maxillary Cast on Articulators: A Pilot Study.
    Anusha CV; Singh AA; Sam G; Sangwan B; Shilpa M; Kamath AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 27340168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study.
    Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with five facebow systems.
    Maveli TC; Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Bahjri K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 26139043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi NP; Hindocha AD; Gunjal AP; Balsaraf KD
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators.
    Gross M; Nemcovsky C; Friedlander LD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2133380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual variation of the distance between nasion and Frankfort horizontal plane-an error factor of facebow in semi-adjustable articulators.
    Casagrande Urdalleta DP; Olmedo RR; Cacciuttolo Fábrega FR; Biotti Picand JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 36309468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
    Kubrak J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro evaluation of the maxillary occlusal plane orientation obtained with an electronic application: A preliminary investigation.
    Maveli TC; Suprono M; Kattadiyil MT; Bahjri K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):146-151. PubMed ID: 28478988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the lateral condylar adjustment of nonarcon semiadjustable articulators.
    Taylor TD; Huber LR; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul; 54(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 3860652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems for planning orthognathic surgery.
    O'Malley AM; Milosevic A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 38(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 10864723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the interchangeability of the Hanau Wide-Vue semiadjustable articulator.
    Dexter WS; Moore DJ; Boardman TJ
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 12017797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple hinge and semiadjustable articulators in orthognathic surgery.
    Marko JV
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Jul; 90(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 3460345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.
    Chang WS; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; Tabacco MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
    Thompson GA; Nick C; Francisco P; Lux L; Wiens JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Stern N; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.