272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31227240)
1. The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing.
Jin MC; Yoon HI; Yeo IS; Kim SH; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 31227240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing: A clinical study.
Yoon SN; Oh KC; Lee SJ; Han JS; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 31926657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An In Vitro Study of Intaglio Surface, Periphery/Palatal Seal Area, and Primary Bearing Area Adaptation of 3D-Printed Denture Base Manufactured in Various Build Angles.
Charoenphol K; Peampring C
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():3824894. PubMed ID: 36440094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
Cameron AB; Evans JL; Abuzar MA; Tadakamadla SK; Love RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional changes of complete dentures fabricated by milled and printed techniques: An in vitro study.
Tsai FC; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):608-615. PubMed ID: 34364688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study.
Hsu CY; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):740-747. PubMed ID: 32448642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the influence of different build angles on the surface characteristics, accuracy, and dimensional stability of the complete denture base printed by digital light processing.
Yan S; Zhou JL; Zhang RJ; Tan FB
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e24095. PubMed ID: 38226211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of trueness in a denture base fabricated by using CAD-CAM systems and adaptation to the socketed surface of denture base: An in vitro study.
You SM; You SG; Lee BI; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 33239193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptation of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by Conventional, Milling, and 3-D Printing Techniques: An
Masri G; Mortada R; Ounsi H; Alharbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):367-371. PubMed ID: 32584270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of surface adaptation of complete denture bases fabricated using milling, material jetting, selective laser sintering, digital light processing, and conventional injection molding.
Schubert O; Edelhoff D; Erdelt KJ; Nold E; Güth JF
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):151-159. PubMed ID: 35060369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a titanium maxillary complete denture baseplate fabricated by using the electron beam melting technique: An in vitro study.
Asakura M; Ueno A; Hayashi T; Kawai T
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):710.e1-710.e7. PubMed ID: 34561095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of digitally fabricated trial dentures.
Wimmer T; Eichberger M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jun; 119(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 28969915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
