270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31227240)
21. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
Gao H; Yang Z; Lin WS; Tan J; Chen L
J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology?
Osman RB; Alharbi N; Wismeijer D
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 28267830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of Accuracy and Position of Milled and 3D-Printed Teeth in Digital Complete Dentures.
Saaedi TMASE; Thabet YG; Sabet ME
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 36(6):781-786. PubMed ID: 38109400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study.
Maniewicz S; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Chebib N
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 36116950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fit Accuracy of Complete Denture Base Fabricated by CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Methods.
Charoenphol K; Peampring C
Eur J Dent; 2023 Jul; 17(3):889-894. PubMed ID: 36513334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study.
You SG; You SM; Kang SY; Bae SY; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):479-485. PubMed ID: 32276824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy and tissue surface adaptation of mandibular complete denture polylactic acid pattern fabricated by fused deposition modeling technology].
Deng KH; Wang Y; Chen H; Zhao YJ; Zhou YS; Sun YC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):342-345. PubMed ID: 28613054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study.
Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study.
Faur AB; Rotar RN; Jivănescu A
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):671. PubMed ID: 38851680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of build orientation and bar addition on accuracy of complete denture base fabricated with digital light projection: An in vitro study.
Chaiamornsup P; Katheng A; Ha R; Tsuchida Y; Kanazawa M; Uo M; Minakuchi S; Suzuki T; Takahashi H
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Oct; 67(4):641-646. PubMed ID: 37032072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
Wemken G; Spies BC; Pieralli S; Adali U; Beuer F; Wesemann C
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 27112416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of digital surface displacements of maxillary dentures based on noninvasive anatomic landmarks.
Norvell NG; Korioth TV; Cagna DR; Versluis A
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 29429839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis.
Unkovskiy A; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Li P; Spintzyk S; Kraemer Fernandez P
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33806627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of two computer-aided design software on the adaptation of digitally constructed maxillary complete denture.
Abd El Galil EG; Mohamed SL; Rizk FN; Sabet ME
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 34810366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of ridge lap accuracy and adaptation of the diagnostic tooth arrangement fabricated with CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study.
You SM; You SG; Jeon JH; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):487-493. PubMed ID: 35305834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
