These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Impella Versus Non-Impella for Nonemergent High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Reddy P; Merdler I; Zhang C; Cellamare M; Ben-Dor I; Bernardo NL; Hashim HD; Satler LF; Rogers T; Waksman R Am J Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 225():4-9. PubMed ID: 38871158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex-related difference in the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: Insight from the cVAD registry. Alraies MC; Kaki A; Kajy M; Blank N; Hasan R; Htun WW; Glazier JJ; Elder M; O'Neill WW; Grines CL; Schreiber T Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):536-544. PubMed ID: 31631515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure. Vetrovec GW; Anderson M; Schreiber T; Popma J; Lombardi W; Maini B; Moller JE; Schäfer A; Dixon SR; Hall S; Ohman EM; Mindrescu C; Moses J; O'Neill W Am Heart J; 2018 May; 199():115-121. PubMed ID: 29754648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization. Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry. Burzotta F; Russo G; Ribichini F; Piccoli A; D'Amario D; Paraggio L; Previ L; Pesarini G; Porto I; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Aurigemma C; Verdirosi D; Crea F; Trani C J Interv Cardiol; 2019; 2019():5243913. PubMed ID: 31772533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival. Meraj PM; Doshi R; Schreiber T; Maini B; O'Neill WW J Interv Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 28419573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Device-related complications after Impella mechanical circulatory support implantation: an IMP-IT observational multicentre registry substudy. Ancona MB; Montorfano M; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Briguori C; Pagnesi M; Pazzanese V; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Casu G; Garbo R; Preti G; Nicolini E; Sclafani R; Colonna G; Mojoli M; Siviglia M; Denurra C; Caprioglio F; Scandroglio AM; Tarantini G; Chieffo A Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2021 Dec; 10(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 34389852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry. O'Neill WW; Schreiber T; Wohns DH; Rihal C; Naidu SS; Civitello AB; Dixon SR; Massaro JM; Maini B; Ohman EM J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24329756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impella support and acute kidney injury during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Global cVAD Renal Protection Study. Flaherty MP; Moses JW; Westenfeld R; Palacios I; O'Neill WW; Schreiber TL; Lim MJ; Kaki A; Ghiu I; Mehran R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 95(6):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 31355987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Severely Depressed Left Ventricular Function. Alaswad K; Basir MB; Khandelwal A; Schreiber T; Lombardi W; O'Neill W Am J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 121(6):703-708. PubMed ID: 29370923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women With Cardiogenic Shock Derive Greater Benefit From Early Mechanical Circulatory Support: An Update From the cVAD Registry. Joseph SM; Brisco MA; Colvin M; Grady KL; Walsh MN; Cook JL; J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 29(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 27229327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]