These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31228051)

  • 1. Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.
    Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Beuschel B; Farah MH; Katabi A; Alsawas M; Majzoub AM; Benkhadra R; Seisa MO; Ding JF; Prokop L; Murad MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1884-1891. PubMed ID: 31228051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.
    Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Farah W; Katabi A; Majzoub A; Seisa MO; Benkhadra R; Alsawas M; Larry P; Murad MH
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29345143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online health information on obesity in pregnancy: a systematic review.
    Al Wattar BH; Pidgeon C; Learner H; Zamora J; Thangaratinam S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():147-152. PubMed ID: 27693936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of websites that contain information relating to malaria in pregnancy.
    Hamwela V; Ahmed W; Bath PA
    Public Health; 2018 Apr; 157():50-52. PubMed ID: 29477789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiotherapy for prostate cancer: DISCERN quality assessment of patient-oriented websites in 2018.
    Janssen S; Fahlbusch FB; Käsmann L; Rades D; Vordermark D
    BMC Urol; 2019 May; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 31138209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.
    Nghiem AZ; Mahmoud Y; Som R
    Breast; 2016 Feb; 25():34-7. PubMed ID: 26547835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues.
    Carlsson T; Axelsson O
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e8. PubMed ID: 28073735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health Advice from Internet Discussion Forums: How Bad Is Dangerous?
    Cole J; Watkins C; Kleine D
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):e4. PubMed ID: 26740148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.
    Oxman AD; Paulsen EJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Feb; 19(1):35. PubMed ID: 30786889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of online information on type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
    Weymann N; Härter M; Dirmaier J
    Health Promot Int; 2015 Dec; 30(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 24688114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Content and Quality of Information About Hyperacusis Presented Online.
    Smith SN; Smallwood E; Sereda M; Adams B; Hoare DJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Sep; 29(3S):623-630. PubMed ID: 32946248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
    McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
    Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Individuals' Attitudes Toward Health Websites on Their Perceived Quality of Health Information: An Empirical Study.
    Liu S; Zhang R; Lu X
    Telemed J E Health; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1099-1107. PubMed ID: 30585763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The extent to which cancer patients trust in cancer-related online information: a systematic review.
    Lange L; Peikert ML; Bleich C; Schulz H
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7634. PubMed ID: 31592341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.