These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31228689)

  • 1. Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass- and coal-fired electricity generation in China: A supply chain perspective.
    Wang C; Zhang L; Zhou P; Chang Y; Zhou D; Pang M; Yin H
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():758-767. PubMed ID: 31228689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life cycle cost analysis of solar energy via environmental externality monetization.
    Huang B; Wang Y; Huang Y; Xu X; Chen X; Duan L; Yu G; Li Z; Liu H; Kua HW; Xue B
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 1):158910. PubMed ID: 36152852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
    Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of Generation Efficiencies and Supply Chain Leaks for the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Natural Gas-Fired Electricity in the United States.
    Tavakkoli S; Feng L; Miller SM; Jordaan SM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(4):2540-2550. PubMed ID: 35107984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental and economic evaluation of bioenergy in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Y; Habibi S; MacLean HL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):919-33. PubMed ID: 17824282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Ancora MP; Zhang L; Wang S; Schreifels J; Hao J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jul; 33():125-34. PubMed ID: 26141885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts.
    Machol B; Rizk S
    Environ Int; 2013 Feb; 52():75-80. PubMed ID: 23246069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Achieving Zero/Negative-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Plants Using Amine-Based Postcombustion CO
    Jiang K; Feron P; Cousins A; Zhai R; Li K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Feb; 54(4):2429-2438. PubMed ID: 31990528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China.
    Yuan J; Wang Y; Zhang W; Zhang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):47438-47454. PubMed ID: 36738409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can the electricity price subsidy policy curb NO
    Lin C; Shao S; Sun W; Yin H
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 290():112367. PubMed ID: 33878632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energetic valorization of wood waste: estimation of the reduction in CO2 emissions.
    Vanneste J; Van Gerven T; Vander Putten E; Van der Bruggen B; Helsen L
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(19):3595-602. PubMed ID: 21719072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost analysis of environmental protection price of coal-fired plants in China.
    Zhao Y; Zhang J; Wang Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):18729-18742. PubMed ID: 32207022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030.
    Tong D; Zhang Q; Liu F; Geng G; Zheng Y; Xue T; Hong C; Wu R; Qin Y; Zhao H; Yan L; He K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(21):12905-12914. PubMed ID: 30249091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating palm oil biomass waste utilization in coal-fired power plants for meeting near-term emission targets.
    Mohd Idris MN; Hashim H
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113118. PubMed ID: 34216903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.