192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31228731)
1. Response of TL and OSL passive personal dosimetry systems in poly-energetic and multi-directional photon radiation fields.
Apostolakopoulos FH; Kržanović N; Stanković K; Perazić L
Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Sep; 151():235-241. PubMed ID: 31228731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range.
Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CHARACTERIZATION AND PERFORMANCE TESTS OF A NEW OSL/TL PERSONAL DOSEMETER FOR INDIVIDUAL MONITORING.
Malthez ALMC; Yoshimura EM; Button VLSN; Freitas MB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 29684169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of OSL and TL dosimetry systems against IEC and ICRP standards.
Zidouh I; Arectout A; Bellahsaouia M; Elaarabi D; Chamlal H; Maroufi B; Sadeq Y; Tazi M; Rodenas J; Boukhal H; Chakir E
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jun; 196():110732. PubMed ID: 36924534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FROM MOBILE PHONES AS POSSIBLE EMERGENCY OSL/TL DOSIMETERS.
Sholom S; McKeever SW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):398-401. PubMed ID: 26516131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE USE OF THERMOLUMINESCENCE AND OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE FROM MOBILE PHONES IN EMERGENCY DOSIMETRY.
McKeever SWS; Sholom S; Chandler JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(2):205-235. PubMed ID: 33406531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating dose to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator outside the treatment fields using a skin QED diode, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, and LiF thermoluminescent dosimeters.
Chan MF; Song Y; Dauer LT; Li J; Huang D; Burman C
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 22296877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A personal thermoluminescence dosimeter using LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si detectors for photon fields.
Jung H; Lee KJ; Kim JL
Appl Radiat Isot; 2003 Jul; 59(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12878128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. OSL and TL techniques combined in a beryllium oxide detector to evaluate simultaneously accumulated and single doses.
Malthez ALMC; Freitas MB; Yoshimura EM; Umisedo NK; Button VLSN
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Apr; 110():155-159. PubMed ID: 26784853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of passive dosimeters in proton pencil beam scanning - A EURADOS intercomparison for mailed dosimetry audits in proton therapy centres.
De Saint-Hubert M; De Angelis C; Knežević Ž; Michalec B; Reniers B; Pyszka E; Stolarczyk L; Swakon J; Foltynska G; Wochnik A; Parisi A; Majer M; Harrison RM; Kopec R; Vanhavere F; Olko P
Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():134-143. PubMed ID: 33611050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Type testing of a locally made LiF:Mg,Ti + PTFE TLD for its use as a personal dosimeter.
Azorín J; Torijano E; Azorín C
Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Nov; 141():246-249. PubMed ID: 29843989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Energy dependence measurement of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter by means of characteristic X-rays induced with general diagnostic X-ray equipment].
Takegami K
Igaku Butsuri; 2017; 37(3):201. PubMed ID: 29415967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative TL and OSL efficiency to protons of various dosimetric materials.
Sądel M; Bilski P; Swakoń J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):112-5. PubMed ID: 24036656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Systems According to the IEC 62387:2020 Standard.
Kržanović N; Stanković Petrović J; Živanović M; Krajinović M; Božović P; Kojić A; Topalović D
Health Phys; 2023 Sep; 125(3):186-197. PubMed ID: 37352507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optically stimulated luminescence detectors for dosimetry and LET measurements in light ion beams.
Christensen JB; Muñoz ID; Bassler N; Stengl C; Bossin L; Togno M; Safai S; Jäkel O; Yukihara EG
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37336242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative energy response of indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters Al
Kumar P; Dhabekar B; Sharma SD; Mishra DR; Rawat NS; Kadam S; Chaudhari S; Chandola RM; Agrawal S
Luminescence; 2020 Dec; 35(8):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 32515166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
