255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31229119)
1. Discrimination of sensory attributes by trained assessors and consumers in semi-sweet hard dough biscuits and their drivers of liking and disliking.
Mello LSS; Almeida EL; Melo L
Food Res Int; 2019 Aug; 122():599-609. PubMed ID: 31229119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two rapid descriptive sensory techniques for profiling and screening of drivers of liking of sorghum breads.
Aguiar LA; Rodrigues DB; Queiroz VAV; Melo L; Pineli LLO
Food Res Int; 2020 May; 131():108999. PubMed ID: 32247453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumer Sensory Comparisons Among Beef, Horse, Elk, and Bison Using Preferred Attributes Elicitation and Check-All-That-Apply Methods.
Popoola IO; Bruce HL; McMullen LM; Wismer WV
J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 31509247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drivers of Preference and Perception of Freshness in Roasted Peanuts (Arachis spp.) for European Consumers.
Lykomitros D; Fogliano V; Capuano E
J Food Sci; 2018 Apr; 83(4):1103-1115. PubMed ID: 29577289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying Key Flavors in Strawberries Driving Liking via Internal and External Preference Mapping.
Oliver P; Cicerale S; Pang E; Keast R
J Food Sci; 2018 Apr; 83(4):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29603215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Varying the Color, Aroma, Bitter, and Sweet Levels of a Grapefruit-Like Model Beverage on the Sensory Properties and Liking of the Consumer.
Gous AGS; Almli VL; Coetzee V; de Kock HL
Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30813331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of sensory attributes that drive the likeability of Korean rice wines by American panelists. [Corrected].
Kwak HS; Ahn BH; Kim HR; Lee SY
J Food Sci; 2015 Jan; 80(1):S161-70. PubMed ID: 25559310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Descriptive and hedonic sensory perception of Brazilian consumers for smoked bacon.
Saldaña E; Saldarriaga L; Cabrera J; Behrens JH; Selani MM; Rios-Mera J; Contreras-Castillo CJ
Meat Sci; 2019 Jan; 147():60-69. PubMed ID: 30196202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a central location test versus a home usage test for consumer perception of ready-to-mix protein beverages.
Zhang MT; Jo Y; Lopetcharat K; Drake MA
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Apr; 103(4):3107-3124. PubMed ID: 32089312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and qualitative variation of fat in model vanilla custard desserts: effects on sensory properties and consumer acceptance.
Tomaschunas M; Köhn E; Bennwitz P; Hinrichs J; Busch-Stockfisch M
J Food Sci; 2013 Jun; 78(6):S894-901. PubMed ID: 23772708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Basket Geometry on the Sensory Quality and Consumer Acceptance of Drip Brewed Coffee.
Frost SC; Ristenpart WD; Guinard JX
J Food Sci; 2019 Aug; 84(8):2297-2312. PubMed ID: 31269246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying drivers for consumer acceptance and purchase intent of corn tortilla.
Herrera-Corredor JA; Saidu JE; Khachatryan A; Prinyawiwatkul W; Carballo-Carballo A; Zepeda-Bautista R
J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):S727-31. PubMed ID: 18034760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of sensory properties driving consumers' liking of commercially available kale and arugula.
Barker S; Moss R; McSweeney MB
J Sci Food Agric; 2022 Jan; 102(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 34061358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of static and dynamic sensory product characterizations based on check-all-that-apply questions with consumers.
Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Zorn S; Giménez A; Castura JC; Ares G
Food Res Int; 2017 Jul; 97():215-222. PubMed ID: 28578044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk.
Rizzo PV; Harwood WS; Drake MA
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):6950-6966. PubMed ID: 32505391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensory impact of lowering sugar content in orange nectars to design healthier, low-sugar industrialized beverages.
Pineli LLO; Aguiar LA; Fiusa A; Botelho RBA; Zandonadi RP; Melo L
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():239-244. PubMed ID: 26428862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drivers of high-involvement consumers' intention to buy PDO wines: Valpolicella PDO case study.
Capitello R; Agnoli L; Begalli D
J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3407-17. PubMed ID: 26538481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in Astringency Subqualities Evaluated by Consumers and Trained Assessors on Sangiovese Wine Using Check-All-That-Apply (CATA).
Rinaldi A; Vecchio R; Moio L
Foods; 2021 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33494331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aroma-related cross-modal interactions for sugar reduction in milk desserts: Influence on consumer perception.
Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Giménez A; Ares G
Food Res Int; 2017 Jul; 97():45-50. PubMed ID: 28578063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of drivers of (dis)liking based on dynamic sensory profiles: Comparison of Temporal Dominance of Sensations and Temporal Check-all-that-apply.
Ares G; Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Giménez A; Castura JC
Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():79-87. PubMed ID: 28290300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
