209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31229697)
1. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo kinematics, component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Wang Y; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Komiyama K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Sci; 2020 May; 25(3):452-459. PubMed ID: 31178276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic Hip Kinematics During the Golf Swing After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Hara D; Nakashima Y; Hamai S; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Shimoto T; Yoshimoto K; Iwamoto Y
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1801-9. PubMed ID: 27037283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic hip kinematics during squatting before and after total hip arthroplasty.
Komiyama K; Hamai S; Hara D; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Yoshimoto K; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 13(1):162. PubMed ID: 29970119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.
Eslam Pour A; Lazennec JY; Patel KP; Anjaria MP; Beaulé PE; Schwarzkopf R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):818-828. PubMed ID: 35014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
Hisatome T; Doi H
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Squatting After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient-Reported Outcomes and In Vivo Three-Dimensional Kinematic Study.
Harada S; Hamai S; Gondo H; Higaki H; Ikebe S; Nakashima Y
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Apr; 37(4):734-741. PubMed ID: 34968648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elucidation of target implant orientations with the safety range of hip rotation with adduction or abduction during squatting: Simulation based on
Harada S; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Hara D; Higaki H; Gondo H; Kawahara S; Shiomoto K; Harada T; Nakashima Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1023721. PubMed ID: 36466333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
Widmer KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
Widmer KH
Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Debbi EM; Quevedo González FJ; Jerabek SA; Wright TM; Vigdorchik JM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation.
Harada S; Hamai S; Motomura G; Ikemura S; Fujii M; Kawahara S; Sato T; Hara D; Nakashima Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Feb; 92():105555. PubMed ID: 35026659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impingement Between the Metal Stem and the Ceramic Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Neck Is Not the Only Place Where Impingement Occurs.
Lee S; Yoo JJ; Kim HJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jan; 103(2):139-145. PubMed ID: 33269897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt and their impact on prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty.
Tanaka T; Takao M; Sakai T; Hamada H; Tanaka S; Sugano N
Artif Organs; 2019 Jun; 43(6):569-576. PubMed ID: 30412266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of inclination and anteversion angles on kinematics and contact mechanics of dual mobility hip implants.
Gao Y; Chen Z; Zhang Z; Chen S; Jin Z
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():48-55. PubMed ID: 29933214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel algorithm to efficiently calculate the impingement-free range of motion of irregularly-shaped total hip arthroplasty components.
Feng T; Tang H; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Jin Z
J Orthop Res; 2023 Nov; 41(11):2516-2529. PubMed ID: 37132499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
