These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31230792)

  • 1. Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review - The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.
    Gregory AT; Denniss AR
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1148-1153. PubMed ID: 31230792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to review a paper.
    Benos DJ; Kirk KL; Hall JE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2003 Dec; 27(1-4):47-52. PubMed ID: 12760840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Moher D
    BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():274. PubMed ID: 26521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
    Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review of the biomedical literature.
    Olson CM
    Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal.
    Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journal clubs in the time of preprints.
    Avasthi P; Soragni A; Bembenek JN
    Elife; 2018 Jun; 7():. PubMed ID: 29889024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to review a scientific paper.
    Tandon R
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer reviews: the dreaded rejection.
    Venkatesh S; Maymone MB; Vashi NA
    Dermatol Online J; 2018 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 29634877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Richardson ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.