These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31231432)

  • 1. Social media echo chambers and satisfaction with democracy among Democrats and Republicans in the aftermath of the 2016 US elections.
    Justwan F; Baumgaertner B; Carlisle JE; Clark AK; Clark M
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2018; 28(4):424-442. PubMed ID: 31231432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.
    Bail CA; Argyle LP; Brown TW; Bumpus JP; Chen H; Hunzaker MBF; Lee J; Mann M; Merhout F; Volfovsky A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(37):9216-9221. PubMed ID: 30154168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social media use and vaccination among Democrats and Republicans: Informational and normative influences.
    DeMora SL; Granados Samayoa JA; AlbarracĂ­n D
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jul; 352():117031. PubMed ID: 38850678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate.
    Mandel DR; Omorogbe P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98854. PubMed ID: 24901253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The echo chamber effect on social media.
    Cinelli M; De Francisci Morales G; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Starnini M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(9):. PubMed ID: 33622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment.
    Mosleh M; Martel C; Eckles D; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(7):. PubMed ID: 33563758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misperceptions about out-partisans' democratic values may erode democracy.
    Pasek MH; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Levy-Vene A; Moore-Berg SL
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16284. PubMed ID: 36175450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twitter Language Use Reflects Psychological Differences between Democrats and Republicans.
    Sylwester K; Purver M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137422. PubMed ID: 26375581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The politics of color: preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue.
    Schloss KB; Palmer SE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1481-8. PubMed ID: 24733398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persuading republicans and democrats to comply with mask wearing: An intervention tournament.
    Gelfand M; Li R; Stamkou E; Pieper D; Denison E; Fernandez J; Choi V; Chatman J; Jackson J; Dimant E
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2022 Jul; 101():104299. PubMed ID: 35469190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MAGA Republicans' views of American democracy and society and support for political violence in the United States: Findings from a nationwide population-representative survey.
    Wintemute GJ; Robinson SL; Tomsich EA; Tancredi DJ
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0295747. PubMed ID: 38170700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge.
    Currin CB; Vera SV; Khaledi-Nasab A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9234. PubMed ID: 35654942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign.
    Bastos M; Mercea D; Baronchelli A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206841. PubMed ID: 30388169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partisan self-interest is an important driver for people's support for the regulation of targeted political advertising.
    Baum K; Meissner S; Krasnova H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250506. PubMed ID: 33979358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sick of Health Care Politics? Comparing Views of Quality of Care Between Democrats and Republicans.
    Scott KW; Blendon RJ; Benson JM
    J Healthc Qual; 2016; 38(6):e39-e51. PubMed ID: 27579601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influencing Republicans' and Democrats' attitudes toward Obamacare: Effects of imagined vicarious cognitive dissonance on political attitudes.
    Cooper J; Feldman LA; Blackman SF
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 29659334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why don't politicians talk about meat? The political psychology of human-animal relations in elections.
    Saha S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1021013. PubMed ID: 37425167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Online experiment during the 2020 US-Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization.
    Jahani E; Gallagher N; Merhout F; Cavalli N; Guilbeault D; Leng Y; Bail CA
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19304. PubMed ID: 36369344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Entropy-based detection of Twitter echo chambers.
    Pratelli M; Saracco F; Petrocchi M
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 May; 3(5):pgae177. PubMed ID: 38737768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.