150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31231442)
1. How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?
Matti A; Lima GM; Pettinato C; Pietrobon F; Martinelli F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jun; 53(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 31231442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.
Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images.
Texte E; Gouel P; Thureau S; Lequesne J; Barres B; Edet-Sanson A; Decazes P; Vera P; Hapdey S
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 May; 7(1):28. PubMed ID: 32399752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Naghavi-Behzad M; Vogsen M; Gerke O; Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE; Nissen HJ; Jakobsen NM; Braad PE; Vilstrup MH; Deak P; Hildebrandt MG; Andersen TL
J Imaging; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36976116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing
Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a penalized-likelihood estimation algorithm be used to reduce the injected dose or the acquisition time in
Chicheportiche A; Goshen E; Godefroy J; Grozinsky-Glasberg S; Oleinikov K; Meirovitz A; Gross DJ; Ben-Haim S
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 33580359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proper protocol for routine
Hu H; Huang Y; Sun H; Zhou K; Jiang L; Zhong J; Chen L; Wang L; Han Y; Wu H
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Sep; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 37695324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Q.Clear reconstruction be used to improve [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality in overweight NEN patients?
Zanoni L; Argalia G; Fortunati E; Malizia C; Allegri V; Calabrò D; Civollani S; Campana D; Fanti S; Ambrosini V
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1607-1612. PubMed ID: 34693467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The variation of quantitative parameters and Deauville scores with different reconstruction algorithms in FDG PET/CT imaging of lymphoma patients.
Genc M; Yildirim N; Coskun N; Ozdemir E; Turkolmez S
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 37524200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction versus OS-EM for characterization of small pulmonary nodules in oncologic PET/CT.
Howard BA; Morgan R; Thorpe MP; Turkington TG; Oldan J; James OG; Borges-Neto S
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 31(8):623-628. PubMed ID: 28689358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
