142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31233316)
1. Faking to fit in: Applicants' response strategies to match organizational culture.
Roulin N; Krings F
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Feb; 105(2):130-145. PubMed ID: 31233316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicant Faking of Personality Inventories in College Admission: Applicants' Shift From Honest Responses Is Unsystematic and Related to the Perceived Relevance for the Profession.
Krammer G
J Pers Assess; 2020; 102(6):758-769. PubMed ID: 31403324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.
Krammer G; Sommer M; Arendasy ME
J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):510-523. PubMed ID: 28300431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The nonlinear relationship between atypical applicant experience and hiring: The red flags perspective.
Wechtler HM; Lee CISG; Heyden MLM; Felps W; Lee TW
J Appl Psychol; 2022 May; 107(5):776-794. PubMed ID: 34591559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes.
Chapman DS; Uggerslev KL; Carroll SA; Piasentin KA; Jones DA
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):928-44. PubMed ID: 16162065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions.
Cable DM; Judge TA
J Appl Psychol; 1997 Aug; 82(4):546-61. PubMed ID: 9378683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.
Wilhelmy A; Kleinmann M; Melchers KG; Götz M
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():740. PubMed ID: 28611696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.
Khorramdel L; Kubinger KD; Uitz A
Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 24811884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual Difference Variables and the Occurrence and Effectiveness of Faking Behavior in Interviews.
Buehl AK; Melchers KG
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():686. PubMed ID: 28539895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. APPLICANTS' STRATEGIC USE OF EXTREME OR MIDPOINT RESPONSES WHEN FAKING PERSONALITY TESTS.
König CJ; Mura M; Schmidt J
Psychol Rep; 2015 Oct; 117(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 26444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the relative importance of normative and distinctive organizational preferences as predictors of work attitudes.
Wood D; Lowman GH; Harms PD; Roberts BW
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Feb; 104(2):270-292. PubMed ID: 30284866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers.
Campion MC; Campion ED; Campion MA
J Appl Psychol; 2019 Sep; 104(9):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 30869924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of height on assessments of Finnish female job applicants' managerial abilities.
Lindeman M; Sundvik L
J Soc Psychol; 1994 Apr; 134(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 8201814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Searching for the right fit: development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process.
Swider BW; Zimmerman RD; Barrick MR
J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):880-93. PubMed ID: 25486257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Chan KY; Lee WC; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):943-53. PubMed ID: 11596810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Once an Impression Manager, Always an Impression Manager? Antecedents of Honest and Deceptive Impression Management Use and Variability across Multiple Job Interviews.
Roulin N; Bourdage JS
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():29. PubMed ID: 28174546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
