These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31233316)

  • 21. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system.
    Bell BS; Wiechmann D; Ryan AM
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 16551196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.
    Law SJ; Bourdage J; O'Neill TA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1771. PubMed ID: 27895609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response to a crisis and applicant attraction: Signaling employer brand personality and organizational trust through warm and competent COVID-19 responses.
    Kanwal H; Van Hoye G; Schollaert E
    Int J Sel Assess; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35942079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The hand surgery fellowship application process: expectations, logistics, and costs.
    Meals C; Osterman M
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Apr; 40(4):783-9. PubMed ID: 25721239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS) as an indicator for counterproductive work behavior: Comparing validity in applicant, honest, and directed faking conditions.
    Trent JD; Barron LG; Rose MR; Carretta TR
    Mil Psychol; 2020; 32(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 38536272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: a field study.
    Higgins CA; Judge TA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):622-32. PubMed ID: 15327349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.
    Dubois M; Pansu P
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. PubMed ID: 15762393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
    Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How well will you FIT? Use of a modified MMI to assess applicants' compatibility with an emergency medicine residency program.
    Min AA; Leetch A; Nuño T; Fiorello AB
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29587. PubMed ID: 26842824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
    Sjöberg L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking.
    van Hooft EA; Born MP
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):301-16. PubMed ID: 21967296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
    Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment.
    Feeney JR; Goffin RD; Kemp C; Beshai S; Klammer JD
    Mil Psychol; 2023 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37640383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interventions to nurture excellence in the nursing home culture.
    Deutschman M
    J Gerontol Nurs; 2001 Aug; 27(8):37-43. PubMed ID: 11817436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Social networking and professionalism in otolaryngology residency applicants.
    Golden JB; Sweeny L; Bush B; Carroll WR
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jul; 122(7):1493-6. PubMed ID: 22689312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?
    Valone ALY; Meade AW
    J Pers Assess; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38501713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A meta-analytic test of organizational culture's association with elements of an organization's system and its relative predictive validity on organizational outcomes.
    Hartnell CA; Ou AY; Kinicki AJ; Choi D; Karam EP
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jun; 104(6):832-850. PubMed ID: 30628804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Investigation of Situational and Dispositional Antecedents of Faking Intentions in Selection Interviews.
    Bill B; Melchers KG; Buehl AK; Wank S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2034. PubMed ID: 32973619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.