BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31233658)

  • 1. The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.
    Suwannakhan A; Casanova-Martínez D; Yurasakpong L; Montriwat P; Meemon K; Limpanuparb T
    Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):475-487. PubMed ID: 31233658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?
    Azer SA; AlSwaidan NM; Alshwairikh LA; AlShammari JM
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e008187. PubMed ID: 26443650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics.
    Modiri O; Guha D; Alotaibi NM; Ibrahim GM; Lipsman N; Fallah A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 166():66-70. PubMed ID: 29408776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of Wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology.
    Thomas GR; Eng L; de Wolff JF; Grover SC
    Semin Dial; 2013; 26(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23432369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study.
    Yacob M; Lotfi S; Tang S; Jetty P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 6(1):e18076. PubMed ID: 32417754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students?
    Azer SA
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 26(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 24276492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can pharmacy students use Wikipedia as a learning resource? Critical assessment of articles on chemotherapeutic drugs.
    Azer SA; Alsharafi AA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):333-345. PubMed ID: 36951631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders.
    Handler SJ; Eckhardt SE; Takashima Y; Jackson AM; Truong C; Yazdany T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3249-3258. PubMed ID: 33797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment.
    Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.
    Gordejeva J; Zowalla R; Pobiruchin M; Wiesner M
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 May; 24(5):e36835. PubMed ID: 35576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Wikipedia a reliable learning resource for medical students? Evaluating respiratory topics.
    Azer SA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Mar; 39(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 25727464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study.
    Li X; Chen K; Jia Y; Yin F; Wen X; Wang C; Li Z; Zhang H
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17264. PubMed ID: 38803580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment.
    Seth AK; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Feb; 137(2):287e-295e. PubMed ID: 26818318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia: a comparison with standard textbooks of pharmacology.
    Kräenbring J; Monzon Penza T; Gutmann J; Muehlich S; Zolk O; Wojnowski L; Maas R; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106930. PubMed ID: 25250889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.
    Aaronson NL; Castaño JE; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Jul; 127(7):439-444. PubMed ID: 29774762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.
    Azzam A; Bresler D; Leon A; Maggio L; Whitaker E; Heilman J; Orlowitz J; Swisher V; Rasberry L; Otoide K; Trotter F; Ross W; McCue JD
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 27627633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.