These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31234027)

  • 41. The effect of branding on consumer palatability ratings of beef strip loin steaks.
    Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4930-4942. PubMed ID: 27898970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3302-7. PubMed ID: 15542477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluating consumer acceptability and willingness to pay for various beef chuck muscles.
    Kukowski AC; Maddock RJ; Wulf DM; Fausti SW; Taylor GL
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Nov; 83(11):2605-10. PubMed ID: 16230658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Consumers' preferences for freezing of meat to prevent toxoplasmosis- A stated preference approach.
    Lambooij MS; Veldwijk J; van Gils P; Mangen MJ; Over E; Suijkerbuijk A; Polder J; de Wit GA; Opsteegh M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Mar; 149():1-8. PubMed ID: 30448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Meat packaging, preservation, and marketing implications: Consumer preferences in an emerging economy.
    Wang HH; Chen J; Bai J; Lai J
    Meat Sci; 2018 Nov; 145():300-307. PubMed ID: 30007176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation.
    Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Dec; 83(12):2869-75. PubMed ID: 16282626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters.
    O'Quinn TG; Woerner DR; Engle TE; Chapman PL; Legako JF; Brooks JC; Belk KE; Tatum JD
    Meat Sci; 2016 Feb; 112():90-102. PubMed ID: 26560806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Consumer Preferences for Traceable Food with Different Functions of Safety Information Attributes: Evidence from a Menu-Based Choice Experiment in China.
    Hou B; Hou J; Wu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31878189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Consumers' choice-blindness to ingredient information.
    Cheung TT; Junghans AF; Dijksterhuis GB; Kroese F; Johansson P; Hall L; De Ridder DT
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():2-12. PubMed ID: 26407803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3294-301. PubMed ID: 15542476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Aging implications on fresh muscle traits of Certified Angus Beef steaks.
    Adcock LA; Sawyer JT; Lambert BD; Jones TN; Ball JJ; Wyatt RP; Jackson J
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Dec; 93(12):5863-72. PubMed ID: 26641197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Chinese consumer preference for beef with geographical indications and other attributes.
    Fu R; Li C; Wang L; Gao Z
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jun; 212():109475. PubMed ID: 38447358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Natural Experiment: Using Immersive Technologies to Study the Impact of "All-Natural" Labeling on Perceived Food Quality, Nutritional Content, and Liking.
    Liu R; Hooker NH; Parasidis E; Simons CT
    J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):825-833. PubMed ID: 28178361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Consumers' preference and willingness to pay for graded beef in Polokwane municipality, South Africa.
    Makweya FL; Oluwatayo IB
    Ital J Food Saf; 2019 Mar; 8(1):7654. PubMed ID: 31008083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings.
    Mehaffey JM; Brooks JC; Rathmann RJ; Alsup EM; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Johnson BJ; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3712-21. PubMed ID: 19717772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
    Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
    Botelho A; Dinis I; Lourenço-Gomes L; Moreira J; Costa Pinto L; Simões O
    Appetite; 2017 Nov; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of rapid thawing on the meat quality attributes of USDA select beef strip loin steaks.
    Eastridge JS; Bowker BC
    J Food Sci; 2011 Mar; 76(2):S156-62. PubMed ID: 21535792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.