These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31234118)

  • 21. Investigating the cost to ongoing tasks not associated with prospective memory task requirements.
    Smith RE; Loft S
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():1-13. PubMed ID: 24780347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Allowing brief delays in responding improves event-based prospective memory for young adults living with HIV disease.
    Loft S; Doyle KL; Naar-King S; Outlaw AY; Nichols SL; Weber E; Casaletto KB; Woods SP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(7):761-72. PubMed ID: 25116075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating the effects of ongoing-task bias on prospective memory.
    Strickland L; Loft S; Heathcote A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1495-1513. PubMed ID: 32160817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prefrontal Hemodynamics of Physical Activity and Environmental Complexity During Cognitive Work.
    McKendrick R; Mehta R; Ayaz H; Scheldrup M; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):147-162. PubMed ID: 28146680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 May; 71():39-58. PubMed ID: 30928898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accumulating evidence about what prospective memory costs actually reveal.
    Strickland L; Heathcote A; Remington RW; Loft S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1616-1629. PubMed ID: 28383957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reaction time-related activity reflecting periodic, task-specific cognitive control.
    Barber AD; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky SH
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():100-108. PubMed ID: 26318935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in cognitive function and latent processes of decision-making during incremental ascent to high altitude.
    Lefferts WK; DeBlois JP; White CN; Day TA; Heffernan KS; Brutsaert TD
    Physiol Behav; 2019 Mar; 201():139-145. PubMed ID: 30611763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1432-47. PubMed ID: 23281819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance predictions affect attentional processes of event-based prospective memory.
    Rummel J; Kuhlmann BG; Touron DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):729-41. PubMed ID: 23703025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time-based prospective memory in adults with developmental dyslexia.
    Smith-Spark JH; Zięcik AP; Sterling C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016; 49-50():34-46. PubMed ID: 26649894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Ball BH; Li YP; Bugg JM
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):370-389. PubMed ID: 31628616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment.
    Palada H; Neal A; Strayer D; Ballard T; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1331-1345. PubMed ID: 31282694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 3: Decision making under mental performance pressure in junior elite athletes.
    Parkin BL; Walsh V
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 234():339-359. PubMed ID: 29031471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retrieval in prospective memory: Multiple processes or just delay?
    Anderson FT; McDaniel MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2197-2207. PubMed ID: 30957661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is Semantic Vigilance Impaired by Narrative Memory Demands? Theory and Applications.
    Epling SL; Edgar GK; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 30325648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interplay between control processes and feature relevance: Evidence from dual-task methodology.
    Montefinese M; Hallam G; Thompson HE; Jefferies E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):384-395. PubMed ID: 31476964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1965-1999. PubMed ID: 31177315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.
    Thomas BJ; McBride DM
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25647351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. After-effects without monitoring costs: The impact of prospective memory instructions on task switching performance.
    Meier B; Rey-Mermet A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():85-99. PubMed ID: 28477841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.