These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31234170)

  • 1. Comparison of DNA Extraction Efficiency and Reproducibility of Different Aeration Diffuser Biofilms Using Bead-Beating Protocol.
    Asvapathanagul P; Garrido-Baserba M; Olson BH; Park HD; Chen D; Rosso D
    J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018; 28(6):293-304. PubMed ID: 31234170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linking biofilm growth to fouling and aeration performance of fine-pore diffuser in activated sludge.
    Garrido-Baserba M; Asvapathanagul P; McCarthy GW; Gocke TE; Olson BH; Park HD; Al-Omari A; Murthy S; Bott CB; Wett B; Smeraldi JD; Shaw AR; Rosso D
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():317-328. PubMed ID: 26760484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A survey of biofilms on wastewater aeration diffusers suggests bacterial community composition and function vary by substrate type and time.
    Noble PA; Park HD; Olson BH; Asvapathanagul P; Hunter MC; Garrido-Baserba M; Lee SH; Rosso D
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 100(14):6361-6373. PubMed ID: 27294381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fouling characterization and aeration performance recovery of fine-pore diffusers operated for 10 years in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant.
    Jiang LM; Chen L; Zhou Z; Sun D; Li Y; Zhang M; Liu Y; Du S; Chen G; Yao J
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Jul; 307():123197. PubMed ID: 32208343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling the link amongst fine-pore diffuser fouling, oxygen transfer efficiency, and aeration energy intensity.
    Garrido-Baserba M; Sobhani R; Asvapathanagul P; McCarthy GW; Olson BH; Odize V; Al-Omari A; Murthy S; Nifong A; Godwin J; Bott CB; Stenstrom MK; Shaw AR; Rosso D
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():127-139. PubMed ID: 28064087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from complex phototrophic biofilms.
    Ferrera I; Massana R; Balagué V; Pedrós-Alió C; Sánchez O; Mas J
    Biofouling; 2010 Apr; 26(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 20140796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an Escherichia coli K12-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay and DNA isolation suited to biofilms associated with iron drinking water pipe corrosion products.
    Lu J; Gerke TL; Buse HY; Ashbolt NJ
    J Water Health; 2014 Dec; 12(4):763-71. PubMed ID: 25473986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time quantitative PCR assay on bacterial DNA: In a model soil system and environmental samples.
    Kabir S; Rajendran N; Amemiya T; Itoh K
    J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2003 Apr; 49(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12833213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of acid cleaning on a fine pore ceramic diffuser aeration system.
    Hung CH; Boyle WC
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):211-8. PubMed ID: 11547986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "MINES" method for genomic DNA extraction from deep biosphere biofilms.
    Govil T; Sharma W; Chauhan NK; Kumar S; Salem DR; Sani RK
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Dec; 167():105730. PubMed ID: 31676422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving aeration systems in saline water (part II): effect of different salts and diffuser type on oxygen transfer of fine-bubble aeration systems.
    Behnisch J; Schwarz M; Trippel J; Engelhart M; Wagner M
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 83(11):2778-2792. PubMed ID: 34115631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full scale evaluation of diffuser ageing with clean water oxygen transfer tests.
    Krampe J
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(3):700-7. PubMed ID: 22097050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Method for recovery of intact DNA for community analysis of marine intertidal microbial biofilms.
    Narváez-Zapata JA; Rodríguez-Avila N; Ortega-Morales BO
    Mol Biotechnol; 2005 May; 30(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 15805576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation outcome of actinobacteria diversity in saline environment influenced by different DNA extraction methods].
    Zhang J; Xia Z; He J; Sun H; Zhang L
    Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2013 Jul; 53(7):746-57. PubMed ID: 24195382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative measurement of fungal DNA extracted by three different methods using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Kabir S; Rajendran N; Amemiya T; Itoh K
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2003; 96(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 16233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of bacterial diversity in river biofilms using 16S rDNA PCR-DGGE: methodological settings and fingerprints interpretation.
    Lyautey E; Lacoste B; Ten-Hage L; Rols JL; Garabetian F
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):380-8. PubMed ID: 15644246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil.
    Bürgmann H; Pesaro M; Widmer F; Zeyer J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2001 May; 45(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11295193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.
    Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium.
    Amaro A; Duarte E; Amado A; Ferronha H; Botelho A
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 47(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18498320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical Pre-Treatment Improves Efficient DNA Extraction and qPCR Sensitivity from Clostridium Difficile Spores in Faecal Swine Specimens.
    Grześkowiak Ł; Zentek J; Vahjen W
    Curr Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 73(5):727-731. PubMed ID: 27534405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.