These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31234724)

  • 21. Verbal Descriptions Accompanying Numeric Information About the Risk: The Valence of Message and Linguistic Polarity.
    Olchowska-Kotala A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Dec; 48(6):1429-1439. PubMed ID: 31422496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The interplay between the importance of a decision and emotion in decision-making.
    Gosling CJ; Caparos S; Moutier S
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1260-1270. PubMed ID: 32193991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions.
    Krishnamurthy P; Carter P; Blair E
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 Jul; 85(2):382-399. PubMed ID: 11461207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pseudo-set framing.
    Barasz K; John LK; Keenan EA; Norton MI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1460-1477. PubMed ID: 28967777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cultural Variability in the Attribute Framing Effect.
    Cheon JE; Nam Y; Kim KJ; Lee HI; Park HG; Kim YH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():754265. PubMed ID: 34987445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Brain network response underlying decisions about abstract reinforcers.
    Mills-Finnerty C; Hanson C; Hanson SJ
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():48-54. PubMed ID: 25234115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When good is stickier than bad: Understanding gain/loss asymmetries in sequential framing effects.
    Sparks J; Ledgerwood A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Aug; 146(8):1086-1105. PubMed ID: 28425745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Object-based attention is mediated by collinearity of targets.
    Crundall D; Cole GG; Galpin A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):137-53. PubMed ID: 17162512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Information order and outcome framing: an assesment of judgment bias in a naturalistic decision-making context.
    Perrin BM; Barnett BJ; Walrath L; Grossman JD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):227-38. PubMed ID: 11592664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Positivity helps the medicine go down: Leveraging framing and affective contexts to enhance the likelihood to take medications.
    Minton AR; Young NA; Nievera MA; Mikels JA
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):1062-1073. PubMed ID: 33180530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does framing the hot hand belief change decision-making behavior in volleyball?
    Raab M; MacMahon C
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2015 Jun; 86(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 25965112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attention and attribute overlap in preferential choice.
    Bhatia S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1174-1196. PubMed ID: 27045894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Sip KE; Muratore AF; Stern ER
    J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Apr; 75():82-90. PubMed ID: 26828371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame.
    Pastötter B; Gleixner S; Neuhauser T; Bäuml KH
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23280150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.
    Cassotti M; Habib M; Poirel N; Aïte A; Houdé O; Moutier S
    Emotion; 2012 Oct; 12(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 22309727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Negativity bias in attribution of external agency.
    Morewedge CK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):535-45. PubMed ID: 19883135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of Emotion and Cognition on Age Differences in the Framing Effect.
    Pu B; Peng H; Xia S
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 2017 Sep; 85(3):305-325. PubMed ID: 28792247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Moderating the interaction between procedural justice and decision frame: the counterbalancing effect of personality traits.
    Sasaki H; Hayashi Y
    J Psychol; 2013; 147(2):125-51. PubMed ID: 23469475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Open to offers, but resisting requests: How the framing of anchors affects motivation and negotiated outcomes.
    Majer JM; Trötschel R; Galinsky AD; Loschelder DD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Sep; 119(3):582-599. PubMed ID: 31556681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.