91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31236733)
1. Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT scans of impacted maxillary canines.
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Ekholm M
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):897-905. PubMed ID: 31236733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary impacted canines.
Ngo CTT; Fishman LS; Rossouw PE; Wang H; Said O
Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29561656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Will supplemental cone beam computed tomography change the treatment plan of impacted maxillary canines based on 2D radiography? A prospective clinical study.
Stoustrup P; Videbæk A; Wenzel A; Matzen LH
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 37934968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional orthodontic radiographic modalities and cone-beam computed tomography for localization of impacted maxillary canine teeth.
Salari B; Tofangchiha M; Padisar P; Reda R; Zanza A; Testarelli L
Sci Prog; 2024; 107(1):368504241228077. PubMed ID: 38359866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of complications associated with unerupted maxillary canines: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Vasiljkovic BM; Antic S; Pficer JK; Djokic D
Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):526-536. PubMed ID: 37644295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning in orthodontics:
Chen S; Wang L; Li G; Wu TH; Diachina S; Tejera B; Kwon JJ; Lin FC; Lee YT; Xu T; Shen D; Ko CC
Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31403836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Maxilla Impacted Canine Positions on Root Resorption of Adjacent Teeth Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging.
Narmada IB; Putri AR
Acta Med Philipp; 2024; 58(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 38939849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional decision support system for treatment of canine impaction.
Keener DJ; de Oliveira Ruellas AC; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Arriola-Guillén LE; Bianchi J; Oh H; Gurgel ML; Benavides E; Soki F; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Ruíz-Mora GA; Barkley M; Gebeck T; Hannapel E; McClatchey LM; Pinzon M; Roberts C; Cevidanes L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Oct; 164(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 37037759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impacted maxillary canine: Assessment of prevalence, severity and location of root resorption on maxillary incisors: A retrospective CBCT study.
Ng WL; Cunningham A; Pandis N; Bister D; Seehra J
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(3):100890. PubMed ID: 38838434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of the dental follicle volume of palatally impacted canines on the relative position of the adjacent teeth.
Lam M; Dekel E; Nucci L; Grassia V; Naoumova J; Pacheco-Pereira C; Perillo L; Chaushu S; Flores-Mir C
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38001047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of CBCT in Preoperative Assessment of Impacted Canines vs. Panoramic Radiography.
Alayyash A
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S513-S515. PubMed ID: 38595619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthodontic Localization of Impacted Canines: Review of the Cutting-edge Evidence in Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Based on 3D CBCT Images.
Farha P; Nguyen M; Karanth D; Dolce C; Arqub SA
Turk J Orthod; 2023 Dec; 36(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 38164014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex estimation by volumetric evaluation of the maxillary canine using cone-beam computed tomographic images.
Özeren Keşkek C; Yılancı HÖ; Akçiçek G
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):194. PubMed ID: 38321411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep learning driven segmentation of maxillary impacted canine on cone beam computed tomography images.
Swaity A; Elgarba BM; Morgan N; Ali S; Shujaat S; Borsci E; Chilvarquer I; Jacobs R
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):369. PubMed ID: 38172136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the positional and morphological differences of unilaterally impacted canines: A cross-sectional study.
Topsakal KG; Gökmen Ş; Uçaker YE; Öztürk T; Yağci A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 May; ():101920. PubMed ID: 38795908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Utility of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in Diagnosing and Treating Anterior Lesions of the Maxilla and Mandible.
Muttanahally KS; Sheppard S; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52804. PubMed ID: 38389599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT.
Suomalainen A; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Robinson S
Insights Imaging; 2015 Feb; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25575868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 3D Easy Box cone-beam computed tomography analysis with 2D Modified Easy Box on OPG as a prognostic tool for impacted maxillary canines: A pilot study.
Dias R; Kanungo H; Gupta M; Mishra K; Soni A; Jaiswal A
J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():14653125241242138. PubMed ID: 38561938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
