These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31236822)

  • 1. Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.
    Kóbor A; Horváth K; Kardos Z; Takács Á; Janacsek K; Csépe V; Nemeth D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1546-1566. PubMed ID: 31236822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceiving structure in unstructured stimuli: Implicitly acquired prior knowledge impacts the processing of unpredictable transitional probabilities.
    Kóbor A; Horváth K; Kardos Z; Nemeth D; Janacsek K
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104413. PubMed ID: 32747072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit anticipation of probabilistic regularities: Larger CNV emerges for unpredictable events.
    Kóbor A; Kardos Z; Horváth K; Janacsek K; Takács Á; Csépe V; Nemeth D
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jun; 156():107826. PubMed ID: 33716039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the influence of informational content and key-response effect mapping on implicit learning and error monitoring in the serial reaction time (SRT) task.
    Rüsseler J; Münte TF; Wiswede D
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):259-273. PubMed ID: 29128978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order adjacent and nonadjacent sequential dependencies.
    Remillard G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):400-24. PubMed ID: 17853201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New insights into statistical learning and chunk learning in implicit sequence acquisition.
    Du Y; Clark JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1225-1233. PubMed ID: 27812961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERPs differentiate the sensitivity to statistical probabilities and the learning of sequential structures during procedural learning.
    Kóbor A; Takács Á; Kardos Z; Janacsek K; Horváth K; Csépe V; Nemeth D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():180-193. PubMed ID: 29634990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Goschke T; Schlaghecken F; Stürmer B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Jul; 22(4):970-87. PubMed ID: 8708606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visuospatial sequence learning on the serial reaction time task modulates the P1 event-related potential.
    Lum JAG; Lammertink I; Clark GM; Fuelscher I; Hyde C; Enticott PG; Ullman MT
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Feb; 56(2):e13292. PubMed ID: 30246295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regularity of approaching visual stimuli influences spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 28271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential effects of the stimulus sequence on CNV and P300.
    Stadler W; Klimesch W; Pouthas V; Ragot R
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 17081506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of visuospatial implicit sequence learning on visual stimulus processing: Evidence from event-related potentials and neural synchrony.
    Fujii Y; Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103662. PubMed ID: 35785681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():223-234. PubMed ID: 27570107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations.
    Rüsseler J; Rösler F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 Mar; 104(1):45-67. PubMed ID: 10769939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials.
    Rüsseler J; Hennighausen E; Münte TF; Rösler F
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 12429364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the neurodevelopment of visual statistical learning using event-related brain potentials.
    Jost E; Conway CM; Purdy JD; Walk AM; Hendricks MA
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():95-107. PubMed ID: 25475992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regularity Extraction Across Species: Associative Learning Mechanisms Shared by Human and Non-Human Primates.
    Rey A; Minier L; Malassis R; Bogaerts L; Fagot J
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jul; 11(3):573-586. PubMed ID: 29785844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No effect of target probability on P3b amplitudes.
    Wascher E; Arnau S; Schneider D; Hoppe K; Getzmann S; Verleger R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():107-115. PubMed ID: 32376160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is insight a godsend? Explicit knowledge in the serial response-time task has precursors in EEG potentials already at task onset.
    Verleger R; Seitz A; Yordanova J; Kolev V
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 125():24-35. PubMed ID: 26226325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.