These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31236897)

  • 1. Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 31236897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
    Han SW
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition.
    Han SW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 25192799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working Memory-Driven Attention in Real-World Search.
    Jung S; Yoon Y; Han SW
    Perception; 2018 Sep; 47(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 30058444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory-driven attention improves spatial resolution: Support for perceptual enhancement.
    Pan Y; Luo Q; Cheng M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1625-32. PubMed ID: 27192995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual features for perception, attention, and working memory: Toward a three-factor framework.
    Huang L
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():43-52. PubMed ID: 26299507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.
    Yang Y; Su L; Pan Y
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 38478053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory load predicts visual search efficiency: Evidence from a novel pupillary response paradigm.
    Attar N; Schneps MH; Pomplun M
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1038-49. PubMed ID: 27119363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.