These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31236904)

  • 1. Adaptation to Animacy Violations during Listening Comprehension.
    Boudewyn MA; Blalock AR; Long DL; Swaab TY
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1247-1258. PubMed ID: 31236904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension.
    Nakano H; Saron C; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2886-98. PubMed ID: 19929760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related brain potential evidence for animacy processing asymmetries during sentence comprehension.
    Nieuwland MS; Martin AE; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2013 Aug; 126(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 23735756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural dynamics of animacy processing in language comprehension: ERP evidence from the interpretation of classifier-noun combinations.
    Zhang Y; Zhang J; Min B
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 22099971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animacy-based predictions in language comprehension are robust: contextual cues modulate but do not nullify them.
    Muralikrishnan R; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2015 May; 1608():108-37. PubMed ID: 25619551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials.
    Philipp M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Bisang W; Schlesewsky M
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):112-33. PubMed ID: 17996287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Kuperberg GR; Kreher DA; Sitnikova T; Caplan DN; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Lang; 2007 Mar; 100(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 16546247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Swaab TY
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):607-24. PubMed ID: 25673006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent use of animacy and event-knowledge during comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Vega-Mendoza M; Pickering MJ; Nieuwland MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Feb; 152():107724. PubMed ID: 33347913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.
    Wang L; Wlotko E; Alexander E; Schoot L; Kim M; Warnke L; Kuperberg GR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(16):3278-3291. PubMed ID: 32161141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context updating during sentence comprehension: the effect of aboutness topic.
    Burmester J; Spalek K; Wartenburger I
    Brain Lang; 2014 Oct; 137():62-76. PubMed ID: 25156161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
    Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.
    Dave S; Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1768():147573. PubMed ID: 34216583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The processing of animacy in noun-classifier combinations in reading Korean: An ERP study.
    Jin L
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():23-32. PubMed ID: 30098583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young children's sentence comprehension: Neural correlates of syntax-semantic competition.
    Strotseva-Feinschmidt A; Schipke CS; Gunter TC; Brauer J; Friederici AD
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Aug; 134():110-121. PubMed ID: 30442450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.