These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Exploratory Development of Algorithms for Determining Driver Attention Status. Herbers E; Miller M; Neurauter L; Walters J; Glaser D Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 37732402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Young Novice Drivers' Cognitive Distraction Detection: Comparing Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Model of Vehicle Control Behavior. Xue Q; Wang X; Li Y; Guo W Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction. Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 36178277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction. Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hierarchical machine learning classification approach for secondary task identification from observed driving behavior data. Osman OA; Hajij M; Karbalaieali S; Ishak S Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():274-281. PubMed ID: 30554059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance. Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distracted driving behavior in patients with insomnia. Zhang Q; Xu L; Yan Y; Li G; Qiao D; Tian J Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106971. PubMed ID: 36657234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups. Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of mobile phone use engagement during naturalistic driving through explainable imbalanced machine learning. Ziakopoulos A; Kontaxi A; Yannis G Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106936. PubMed ID: 36577243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating Driver Features for Cognitive Distraction Detection and Validation in Manual and Level 2 Automated Driving. Yang S; Wilson KM; Roady T; Kuo J; Lenné MG Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):746-759. PubMed ID: 33054370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the difference in driver's lateral control ability during naturalistic distracted driving and normal driving? A case study on a real highway. Wang C; Li Z; Fu R; Guo Y; Yuan W Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():98-105. PubMed ID: 30738295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator: the influence of driver age. Rumschlag G; Palumbo T; Martin A; Head D; George R; Commissaris RL Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():145-9. PubMed ID: 25463954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inclusion of phone use while driving data in predicting distraction-affected crashes. Guo X; Wu L; Kong X; Zhang Y J Safety Res; 2021 Dec; 79():321-328. PubMed ID: 34848012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An XGBoost approach to detect driver visual distraction based on vehicle dynamics. Guo Y; Ding H; ShangGuan X Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(6):458-465. PubMed ID: 37272712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation. Gao J; Davis GA J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups? Liang OS; Yang CC Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106505. PubMed ID: 34844081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CBAM VGG16: An efficient driver distraction classification using CBAM embedded VGG16 architecture. Praharsha CH; Poulose A Comput Biol Med; 2024 Sep; 180():108945. PubMed ID: 39094328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of driver engagement in secondary tasks from observed naturalistic driving behavior. Ye M; Osman OA; Ishak S; Hashemi B Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():385-391. PubMed ID: 28719829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]