263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31237856)
1. Success Rate of Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children.
Valcheva KP; Murgova SV; Krivoshiiska EK
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Mar; 61(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 31237856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of nasolacrimal duct probing in children between 9-48 months.
Medghalchi A; Mohammadi MJ; Soltani Moghadam R; Dalili H
Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(7):545-51. PubMed ID: 25135264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial nasolacrimal duct probing in children under age 5: cure rate and factors affecting success.
Kashkouli MB; Kassaee A; Tabatabaee Z
J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 12506276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing in the treatment of membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction between younger and older children and its correlation with the thickness of the membrane at the Valve of Hasner.
Gupta N; Neeraj C; Smriti B; Sima D
Orbit; 2018 Aug; 37(4):257-261. PubMed ID: 29040026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan.
Hung CH; Chen YC; Lin SL; Chen WL
Pediatr Neonatol; 2015 Dec; 56(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 26026949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of buried probe in complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and evaluation of its success rate post 'probing and irrigation': a single-centre retrospective study.
Gupta N; Chawla N; Ganesh S; Das S; Dhawan N; Bansal S; Singla P
Orbit; 2018 Dec; 37(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 29400586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Cha DS; Lee H; Park MS; Lee JM; Baek SH
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 21052504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Predictive of Success in Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
Beato J; Mota Á; Gonçalves N; Santos-Silva R; Magalhães A; Breda J; Falcão-Reis F
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 54(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 27977034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.
Une VL; Kulkarni SS; Nandedkar VS
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 May; 56(3):141-145. PubMed ID: 31116859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success rates of primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction in children.
Arora S; Koushan K; Harvey JT
J AAPOS; 2012 Apr; 16(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 22525175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: irrigation or probing?
Kim YS; Moon SC; Yoo KW
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 14(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 11213741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dilation probing as primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Clark RA
J AAPOS; 2002 Dec; 6(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12506277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing.
Goldstein SM; Goldstein JB; Katowitz JA
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 15377901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Andalib D; Nabei R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 23225091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Success rates of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages.
Świerczyńska M; Tobiczyk E; Rodak P; Barchanowska D; Filipek E
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):403. PubMed ID: 33032542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Fujimoto M; Ogino K; Matsuyama H; Miyazaki C
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 60(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 27116947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of balloon catheter dilatation and silicon intubation as the secondary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing].
Hu M; Wu Q; Fan YW; Cao WW; Lin Q; Yu G
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 52(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 26906708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
