BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31239513)

  • 1. Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI.
    Porter KK; King A; Galgano SJ; Sherrer RL; Gordetsky JB; Rais-Bahrami S
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 31239513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
    van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
    Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Sherrer RL; Glaser ZA; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Porter KK; Rais-Bahrami S
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 May; 22(2):331-336. PubMed ID: 30413806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
    Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2?
    Stanzione A; Imbriaco M; Cocozza S; Fusco F; Rusconi G; Nappi C; Mirone V; Mangiapia F; Brunetti A; Ragozzino A; Longo N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2269-2274. PubMed ID: 27842676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
    Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of short biparametric magnetic resonance imaging protocol in men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Faccioli N; Santi E; Foti G; Curti P; D'Onofrio M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Jun; 94(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 35775339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
    Junker D; Steinkohl F; Fritz V; Bektic J; Tokas T; Aigner F; Herrmann TRW; Rieger M; Nagele U
    World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):691-699. PubMed ID: 30078170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Multiparametric and Biparametric MRI in First Round Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients with PSA Levels under 10 ng/mL.
    Lee DH; Nam JK; Lee SS; Han JY; Lee JW; Chung MK; Park SW
    Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):994-999. PubMed ID: 28792144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement.
    Palumbo P; Manetta R; Izzo A; Bruno F; Arrigoni F; De Filippo M; Splendiani A; Di Cesare E; Masciocchi C; Barile A
    Gland Surg; 2020 Dec; 9(6):2235-2247. PubMed ID: 33447576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
    Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.
    Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB; Otazo R; Sodickson DK; Kang SK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 30629317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate with three functional techniques in patients with PSA elevation before initial TRUS-guided biopsy.
    Hauth E; Hohmuth H; Cozub-Poetica C; Bernand S; Beer M; Jaeger H
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150422. PubMed ID: 26268144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
    Walton Diaz A; Shakir NA; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Turkbey B; Rothwax JT; Stamatakis L; Hong CW; Siddiqui MM; Okoro C; Raskolnikov D; Su D; Shih J; Han H; Parnes HL; Merino MJ; Simon RM; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
    Urol Oncol; 2015 May; 33(5):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 25754621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) using whole-mount histological sections as the reference standard.
    Russo F; Regge D; Armando E; Giannini V; Vignati A; Mazzetti S; Manfredi M; Bollito E; Correale L; Porpiglia F
    BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 26198404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
    Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.