These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31240636)

  • 21. The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment.
    Watt AM; Hiller JE; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Moss JR; Buchan H; Wale J; Riitano DE; Hodgetts K; Street JM; Elshaug AG;
    Implement Sci; 2012 Oct; 7():101. PubMed ID: 23088222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.
    Mallidou AA; Frisch N; Doyle-Waters MM; MacLeod MLP; Ward J; Atherton P
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):101. PubMed ID: 30025543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating stakeholder involvement in building a decision support tool for NHS health checks: co-producing the WorkHORSE study.
    Lloyd-Williams F; Hyseni L; Guzman-Castillo M; Kypridemos C; Collins B; Capewell S; Schwaller E; O'Flaherty M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Aug; 20(1):182. PubMed ID: 32778087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adaptive approaches to licensing, health technology assessment, and introduction of drugs and devices.
    Husereau D; Henshall C; Jivraj J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jul; 30(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 24921416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Magwood O; Riddle A; Petkovic J; Lytvyn L; Khabsa J; Atwere P; Akl EA; Campbell P; Welch V; Smith M; Mustafa RA; Limburg H; Dans LF; Skoetz N; Grant S; Concannon T; Tugwell P
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Jun; 18(2):e1237. PubMed ID: 36911345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferences for engagement in health technology assessment decision-making: a nominal group technique with members of the public.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Howard K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010265. PubMed ID: 26832433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evolving role of patient preference studies in health-care decision-making, from clinical drug development to clinical care management.
    Jackson Y; Janssen E; Fischer R; Beaverson K; Loftus J; Betteridge K; Rhoten S; Flood E; Lundie M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Aug; 19(4):383-396. PubMed ID: 31070048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. OVERCOMING THE BARRIERS TO ACHIEVING UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE IN THE ASIAN REGION.
    Mundy L; Trowman R; Kearney B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(4):352-359. PubMed ID: 29986782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Involving patients in health technology funding decisions: stakeholder perspectives on processes used in Australia.
    Lopes E; Street J; Carter D; Merlin T
    Health Expect; 2016 Apr; 19(2):331-44. PubMed ID: 25703958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying and Revealing the Importance of Decision-Making Criteria for Health Technology Assessment: A Retrospective Analysis of Reimbursement Recommendations in Ireland.
    Schmitz S; McCullagh L; Adams R; Barry M; Walsh C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Sep; 34(9):925-37. PubMed ID: 27034245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.
    Wortley S; Tong A; Howard K
    Aust Health Rev; 2017 Mar; 41(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27050156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and Validation of the TRansparent Uncertainty ASsessmenT (TRUST) Tool for Assessing Uncertainties in Health Economic Decision Models.
    Grimm SE; Pouwels X; Ramaekers BLT; Wijnen B; Knies S; Grutters J; Joore MA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Feb; 38(2):205-216. PubMed ID: 31709496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Economic modelling of diagnostic and treatment pathways in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines: the Modelling Algorithm Pathways in Guidelines (MAPGuide) project.
    Lord J; Willis S; Eatock J; Tappenden P; Trapero-Bertran M; Miners A; Crossan C; Westby M; Anagnostou A; Taylor S; Mavranezouli I; Wonderling D; Alderson P; Ruiz F
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Dec; 17(58):v-vi, 1-192. PubMed ID: 24325843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility.
    Hrynaszkiewicz I
    Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2020; 257():319-348. PubMed ID: 31691858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Verification of Decision-Analytic Models for Health Economic Evaluations: An Overview.
    Dasbach EJ; Elbasha EH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Jul; 35(7):673-683. PubMed ID: 28456972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MOST IMPORTANT BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS REGARDING THE USE OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Cheung KL; Evers SMAA; de Vries H; Hiligsmann M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 28849758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supporting rehabilitation stakeholders in making service delivery decisions: a rapid review of multi-criteria decision analysis methods.
    Cahill PT; Reitzel M; Anaby DR; Camden C; Phoenix M; Romoff S; Campbell WN
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(12):1933-1946. PubMed ID: 35649688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How helpful are Patient and Public Involvement strategic documents - Results of a framework analysis using 4Pi National Involvement Standards.
    Matthews R; Kaur M; French C; Baker A; Reed J
    Res Involv Engagem; 2019; 5():31. PubMed ID: 31700675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.