These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3124182)
1. Low doses of cis-flupentixol attenuate motor performance. Heyman GM; Monaghan MM; Clody DE Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 93(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 3124182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy. Heyman GM Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 109(1-2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1365648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Heyman GM; Kinzie DL; Seiden LS Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 3083455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement in the rat. Evenden JL; Robbins TW Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1983; 79(2-3):180-6. PubMed ID: 6405426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of dopamine blockade on renal sodium excretion. Pelayo JC; Fildes RD; Eisner GM; Jose PA Am J Physiol; 1983 Aug; 245(2):F247-53. PubMed ID: 6881340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on food-reinforced tracking of a visual stimulus by rats. Evenden JL; Robbins TW Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 85(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 3923522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective and subjective assessments of the effects of flupentixol and benzodiazepines on human psychomotor performance. Mattila MJ; Mattila M; Aranko K Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 95(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 2901125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Training-dependent decay in performance produced by the neuroleptic cis(Z)-flupentixol on spatial navigation by rats in a swimming pool. Whishaw IQ; Mittleman G; Evenden JL Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Jan; 32(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 2734332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. Ettenberg A; Koob GF; Bloom FE Science; 1981 Jul; 213(4505):357-9. PubMed ID: 7244622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chronic flupentixol treatment potentiates the reinforcing properties of systemic heroin administration. Stinus L; Nadaud D; Deminière JM; Jauregui J; Hand TT; Le Moal M Biol Psychiatry; 1989 Aug; 26(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 2765599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine. Galbicka G; Fowler KP; Ritch ZJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 1955813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats. Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroleptic-induced deficits in operant responding for temperature reinforcement. Ettenberg A; Carlisle HJ Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 May; 22(5):761-7. PubMed ID: 4011636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. Heyman GM J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 6631310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Petry NM Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A parametric description of amphetamine's effect on response rate: changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography. Heyman GM; Seiden LS Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 85(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 3925482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. cis-Flupentixol antagonism of the rat prefrontal cortex neuronal response to apomorphine and ventral tegmental area input. Peterson SL; St Mary JS; Harding NR Brain Res Bull; 1987 Jun; 18(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 3620997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength. Heyman GM; Monaghan MM J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):505-16. PubMed ID: 16812733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]