188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31242412)
41. Electroporation enables the efficient mRNA delivery into the mouse zygotes and facilitates CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing.
Hashimoto M; Takemoto T
Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11315. PubMed ID: 26066060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. CRISPR-Cas9 technology: applications and human disease modelling.
Torres-Ruiz R; Rodriguez-Perales S
Brief Funct Genomics; 2017 Jan; 16(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 27345434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Tild-CRISPR Allows for Efficient and Precise Gene Knockin in Mouse and Human Cells.
Yao X; Zhang M; Wang X; Ying W; Hu X; Dai P; Meng F; Shi L; Sun Y; Yao N; Zhong W; Li Y; Wu K; Li W; Chen ZJ; Yang H
Dev Cell; 2018 May; 45(4):526-536.e5. PubMed ID: 29787711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Generation of gene-edited rats by delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 protein and donor DNA into intact zygotes using electroporation.
Remy S; Chenouard V; Tesson L; Usal C; Ménoret S; Brusselle L; Heslan JM; Nguyen TH; Bellien J; Merot J; De Cian A; Giovannangeli C; Concordet JP; Anegon I
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16554. PubMed ID: 29185448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Efficient and Scalable Precision Genome Editing in
Penewit K; Holmes EA; McLean K; Ren M; Waalkes A; Salipante SJ
mBio; 2018 Feb; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 29463653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46.
Lau CH; Suh Y
F1000Res; 2017; 6():2153. PubMed ID: 29333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. CRISPR/Cas-mediated knock-in via non-homologous end-joining in the crustacean Daphnia magna.
Kumagai H; Nakanishi T; Matsuura T; Kato Y; Watanabe H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186112. PubMed ID: 29045453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Electroporation-based Easi-CRISPR yields biallelic insertions of EGFP-HiBiT cassette in immortalized chicken oviduct epithelial cells.
Liu L; Wei J; Chen C; Liang Q; Wang B; Wu W; Li G; Zheng X
Poult Sci; 2023 Dec; 102(12):103112. PubMed ID: 37806084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome modification in the mollusc, Crepidula fornicata.
Perry KJ; Henry JQ
Genesis; 2015 Feb; 53(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 25529990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. CRISPR genome engineering and viral gene delivery: a case of mutual attraction.
Schmidt F; Grimm D
Biotechnol J; 2015 Feb; 10(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 25663455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery.
Andersson M; Turesson H; Olsson N; Fält AS; Ohlsson P; Gonzalez MN; Samuelsson M; Hofvander P
Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 29572864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Uncultured Naive Mouse T Cells for In Vivo Studies.
Nüssing S; House IG; Kearney CJ; Chen AXY; Vervoort SJ; Beavis PA; Oliaro J; Johnstone RW; Trapani JA; Parish IA
J Immunol; 2020 Apr; 204(8):2308-2315. PubMed ID: 32152070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Virus-Mediated Genome Editing via Homology-Directed Repair in Mitotic and Postmitotic Cells in Mammalian Brain.
Nishiyama J; Mikuni T; Yasuda R
Neuron; 2017 Nov; 96(4):755-768.e5. PubMed ID: 29056297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Curative Ex Vivo Hepatocyte-Directed Gene Editing in a Mouse Model of Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1.
VanLith C; Guthman R; Nicolas CT; Allen K; Du Z; Joo DJ; Nyberg SL; Lillegard JB; Hickey RD
Hum Gene Ther; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1315-1326. PubMed ID: 29764210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Generation of site-specific mutations in the rat genome via CRISPR/Cas9.
Guan Y; Shao Y; Li D; Liu M
Methods Enzymol; 2014; 546():297-317. PubMed ID: 25398346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing.
Gupta D; Bhattacharjee O; Mandal D; Sen MK; Dey D; Dasgupta A; Kazi TA; Gupta R; Sinharoy S; Acharya K; Chattopadhyay D; Ravichandiran V; Roy S; Ghosh D
Life Sci; 2019 Sep; 232():116636. PubMed ID: 31295471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Knockin in Mouse Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells.
Tran NT; Sommermann T; Graf R; Trombke J; Pempe J; Petsch K; Kühn R; Rajewsky K; Chu VT
Cell Rep; 2019 Sep; 28(13):3510-3522.e5. PubMed ID: 31553918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Efficient One-Step Knockout by Electroporation of Ribonucleoproteins Into Zona-Intact Bovine Embryos.
Camargo LSA; Owen JR; Van Eenennaam AL; Ross PJ
Front Genet; 2020; 11():570069. PubMed ID: 33133156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Breasi-CRISPR: an efficient genome-editing method to interrogate protein localization and protein-protein interactions in the embryonic mouse cortex.
Meyerink BL; Kc P; Tiwari NK; Kittock CM; Klein A; Evans CM; Pilaz LJ
Development; 2022 Sep; 149(18):. PubMed ID: 35993342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Efficient precision editing of endogenous
Nievergelt AP; Diener DR; Bogdanova A; Brown T; Pigino G
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Aug; 3(8):100562. PubMed ID: 37671018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
