These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31242534)

  • 21. The probability of conditionals: A review.
    López-Astorga M; Ragni M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34173186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Not that neglected! Base rates influence related and unrelated judgments.
    Białek M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():10-16. PubMed ID: 28431299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.
    Rottenstreich Y; Tversky A
    Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 9127585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
    Cobos PL; Almaraz J; García-Madruga JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Similarity between hypotheses and evidence.
    Rottenstreich Y; Brenner L; Sood S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 10090800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Representation, propagation, and decision issues in risk analysis under incomplete probabilistic information.
    Dubois D
    Risk Anal; 2010 Mar; 30(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 20487395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probability judgments of agency: rational or irrational?
    Schmidt T; Heumüller VC
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20122851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compound risk judgment in tasks with both idiosyncratic and systematic risk: The "Robust Beauty" of additive probability integration.
    Sundh J; Juslin P
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():25-41. PubMed ID: 29102806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are random events perceived as rare? On the relationship between perceived randomness and outcome probability.
    Teigen KH; Keren G
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 31900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Motivated perception of probabilistic information.
    Lench HC; Smallman R; Darbor KE; Bench SW
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):429-42. PubMed ID: 25151252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Needing everything (or just one thing) to go right: Myopic preferences for consolidating or spreading risks.
    Wang Y; Baum SM; Critcher CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2023 Oct; 125(4):730-751. PubMed ID: 37227885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mapping Risk Judgment and Risk Taking in Mountain Hiking: An Information Integration Approach.
    Fruchart E; Rulence-Pâques P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2024 Jun; 131(3):897-919. PubMed ID: 38485663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.