268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31242916)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging in categorization of ovarian epithelial cancer and survival analysis with focus on apparent diffusion coefficient value: correlation with Ki-67 expression and serum cancer antigen-125 level.
Zhang G; Yao W; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang P; Jin J; Bai Y; Hua K; Zhang H
J Ovarian Res; 2019 Jun; 12(1):59. PubMed ID: 31242916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors: A correlation with Ki-67 expression.
Li HM; Zhao SH; Qiang JW; Zhang GF; Feng F; Ma FH; Li YA; Gu WY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 46(5):1499-1506. PubMed ID: 28295854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis for Assessing Tumor Staging and Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Correlation with p53 and Ki-67 Expression.
Wang F; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Liu C; Liang D; Xie L; Yao Z; Liu J
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 30456593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High expression of TRIM24 predicts worse prognosis and promotes proliferation and metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Zhang L; Chen H; Ding B; Jiang W
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Feb; 15(1):19. PubMed ID: 35105347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted MRI of epithelial ovarian cancers: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values with histologic grade and surgical stage.
Oh JW; Rha SE; Oh SN; Park MY; Byun JY; Lee A
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 25623826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging for early evaluation of the response to docetaxel in rat epithelial ovarian cancer.
Yuan SJ; Qiao TK; Qiang JW
J Transl Med; 2018 Dec; 16(1):340. PubMed ID: 30518386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient on Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiation between Low and High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer.
Liu X; Wang T; Wang Y; Wang J; Jin J; Zhang G; Zhang H
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 35585829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional tumour burden of peritoneal carcinomatosis derived from DWI could predict incomplete tumour debulking in advanced ovarian carcinoma.
Lee EYP; An H; Perucho JAU; Chiu KWH; Hui ES; Chu MMY; Ngan HYS
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5551-5559. PubMed ID: 32405751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of the MRI features in the differentiation of benign, borderline, and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.
Xiao F; Zhang L; Yang S; Peng K; Hua T; Tang G
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 35062992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined score of pretreatment platelet count and CA125 level (PLT-CA125) stratified prognosis in patients with FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
Chen JP; Huang QD; Wan T; Tu H; Gu HF; Cao JY; Liu JH
J Ovarian Res; 2019 Jul; 12(1):72. PubMed ID: 31362750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between types I and II epithelial ovarian cancer using histogram analysis of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion models.
Wang F; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Liu C; Xie L; Zhou Z; Liang D; Shen Y; Yao Z; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1797-1809. PubMed ID: 28379611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between ADC values and molecular markers of Ki-67 and HIF-1α in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Huang Z; Xu X; Meng X; Hou Z; Liu F; Hua Q; Liu Q; Xiu J
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2464-9. PubMed ID: 26456310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Li Y; Zhang C; Ji R; Lu H; Zhang W; Li LL; Liu R; Qian H; He A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 31822507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer.
Kobayashi S; Koga F; Kajino K; Yoshita S; Ishii C; Tanaka H; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Yamada T; Kihara K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 23589321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of apparent diffusion coefficient and exponent apparent diffusion coefficient values in magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate benign and malignant ovarian epithelial tumors.
Wang YX; Yuan MZ; Wen ZX
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016; 12(1):401-5. PubMed ID: 27072270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of serous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: pathological correlation.
Ono T; Kishimoto K; Tajima S; Maeda I; Takagi M; Suzuki N; Mimura H
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):992-1000. PubMed ID: 31698924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of elevated pretreatment serum levels of CEA and CA-125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Lin YH; Wu CH; Fu HC; Chen YJ; Chen YY; Ou YC; Lin H
Cancer Biomark; 2020; 28(3):285-292. PubMed ID: 32390605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted MRI in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Response Marker.
Winfield JM; Wakefield JC; Dolling D; Hall M; Freeman S; Brenton JD; Lutchman-Singh K; Pace E; Priest AN; Quest RA; Taylor NJ; Gabra H; McKnight L; Collins DJ; Banerjee S; Hall E; deSouza NM
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 31573402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative CA 125: an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Nagele F; Petru E; Medl M; Kainz C; Graf AH; Sevelda P
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 86(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 7617357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
