831 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31245304)
1. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
Angebault C; Payen M; Woerther PL; Rodriguez C; Botterel F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232215. PubMed ID: 32343737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling.
Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities.
Vesty A; Biswas K; Taylor MW; Gear K; Douglas RG
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169877. PubMed ID: 28099455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction and PCR product purification methods for cervicovaginal microbiome analysis using cpn60 microbial profiling.
Shvartsman E; Richmond MEI; Schellenberg JJ; Lamont A; Perciani C; Russell JNH; Poliquin V; Burgener A; Jaoko W; Sandstrom P; MacDonald KS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262355. PubMed ID: 35025956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbial food safety: Potential of DNA extraction methods for use in diagnostic metagenomics.
Josefsen MH; Andersen SC; Christensen J; Hoorfar J
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jul; 114():30-4. PubMed ID: 25937085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies.
Yang F; Sun J; Luo H; Ren H; Zhou H; Lin Y; Han M; Chen B; Liao H; Brix S; Li J; Yang H; Kristiansen K; Zhong H
Gigascience; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32657325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep sequencing analyses of low density microbial communities: working at the boundary of accurate microbiota detection.
Biesbroek G; Sanders EA; Roeselers G; Wang X; Caspers MP; Trzciński K; Bogaert D; Keijser BJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32942. PubMed ID: 22412957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Two Common DNA Extraction Kits for the Characterization of Symbiotic Microbial Communities from Ascidian Tissue.
Evans JS; López-Legentil S; Erwin PM
Microbes Environ; 2018 Dec; 33(4):435-439. PubMed ID: 30487350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome.
Elie C; Perret M; Hage H; Sentausa E; Hesketh A; Louis K; Fritah-Lafont A; Leissner P; Vachon C; Rostaing H; Reynier F; Gervasi G; Saliou A
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10279. PubMed ID: 37355726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of
Hugerth LW; Pereira M; Zha Y; Seifert M; Kaldhusdal V; Boulund F; Krog MC; Bashir Z; Hamsten M; Fransson E; Svarre-Nielsen H; Schuppe-Koistinen I; Engstrand L
mSphere; 2020 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 33208514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial community analysis of activated sludge: an evaluation of four commonly used DNA extraction methods.
Vanysacker L; Declerck SA; Hellemans B; De Meester L; Vankelecom I; Declerck P
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Sep; 88(1):299-307. PubMed ID: 20652692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined bacterial and fungal intestinal microbiota analyses: Impact of storage conditions and DNA extraction protocols.
Angebault C; Ghozlane A; Volant S; Botterel F; d'Enfert C; Bougnoux ME
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201174. PubMed ID: 30074988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Kennedy NA; Walker AW; Berry SH; Duncan SH; Farquarson FM; Louis P; Thomson JM; ; Satsangi J; Flint HJ; Parkhill J; Lees CW; Hold GL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88982. PubMed ID: 24586470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for comprehensive assessment of 16S rRNA bacterial diversity in marine biofilms using high-throughput sequencing.
Corcoll N; Österlund T; Sinclair L; Eiler A; Kristiansson E; Backhaus T; Eriksson KM
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Aug; 364(14):. PubMed ID: 28673033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
