These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31246061)

  • 1. Unconscious or underpowered? Probabilistic cuing of visual attention.
    Vadillo MA; Linssen D; Orgaz C; Parsons S; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):160-181. PubMed ID: 31246061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning.
    Vadillo MA; Konstantinidis E; Shanks DR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 26122896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Raising awareness about measurement error in research on unconscious mental processes.
    Vadillo MA; Malejka S; Lee DYH; Dienes Z; Shanks DR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):21-43. PubMed ID: 34131891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning rapidly about the relevance of visual cues requires conscious awareness.
    Travers E; Frith CD; Shea N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1698-1713. PubMed ID: 30027836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The emergence of explicit knowledge from implicit learning.
    Goujon A; Didierjean A; Poulet S
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 24052189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic cuing of visual search: Neither implicit nor inflexible.
    Giménez-Fernández T; Luque D; Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1222-1234. PubMed ID: 32757593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction and unconscious attention operate synergistically to facilitate stimulus processing: An fMRI study.
    Ran G; Chen X; Cao X; Zhang Q
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Aug; 44():41-50. PubMed ID: 27351781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing": Retraction.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Rosenbaum GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jul; 48(7):782. PubMed ID: 35679190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: Theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples.
    Colagiuri B; Livesey EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1996-2009. PubMed ID: 27220995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.
    Won BY; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):787-806. PubMed ID: 25401460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidental learning of secondary attentional cueing.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 17927945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unconscious learning versus visual perception: dissociable roles for gamma oscillations revealed in MEG.
    Chaumon M; Schwartz D; Tallon-Baudry C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2287-99. PubMed ID: 18855554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating masked priming along the "vision-for-perception" and "vision-for-action" dimensions of unconscious processing.
    Hesselmann G; Darcy N; Rothkirch M; Sterzer P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1641-1659. PubMed ID: 30010373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing.
    Rosenbaum GM; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):888-99. PubMed ID: 23572204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests.
    Smyth AC; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):403-15. PubMed ID: 18426069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious.
    Vicente-Conesa F; Giménez-Fernández T; Luque D; Vadillo MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):796-813. PubMed ID: 36417127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of working memory in probabilistic cuing of visual search.
    Giménez-Fernández T; Vicente-Conesa F; Luque D; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 36326649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Hahn S; Thomas RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():44-53. PubMed ID: 24291120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.