343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31246761)
1. Tradeoffs in Implant Selection for Reconstructive Surgery and Adjuncts Utilized to Maximize Aesthetic Outcomes.
Unger JG; Keller PR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):51S-59S. PubMed ID: 31246761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Primary Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Warren Peled A; Disa JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):60S-65S. PubMed ID: 31246762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introduction to "Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery".
Gabriel A; Maxwell GP; Disa J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):5S-6S. PubMed ID: 31246754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Science of Cohesivity and Elements of Form Stability.
Gabriel A; Maxwell GP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):7S-12S. PubMed ID: 31246755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing Outcomes in 2-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Round Form-Stable Implants.
Sbitany H; Lee KR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):43S-50S. PubMed ID: 31246760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Revisionary Reconstructive Surgery.
Sigalove S; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):66S-72S. PubMed ID: 31246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery.
Chao AH; Garza R; Povoski SP
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 26690709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year Core Study Data for Sientra's Food and Drug Administration-Approved Round and Shaped Breast Implants with Cohesive Silicone Gel.
Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; Harrington JL; d'Incelli RC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):7S-19S. PubMed ID: 29595714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
Sampaio Góes JC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding the Evidence and Improving Outcomes with Implant-Based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Campbell CA; Losken A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):437e-450e. PubMed ID: 34432700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximizing Aesthetics and Patient Selection Utilizing Natrelle Inspira Line Implants in Aesthetic Breast Surgery.
Kortesis BG; Bharti G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):30S-36S. PubMed ID: 31246758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.
Brown MH; Shenker R; Silver SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 116(3):768-79; discussion 780-1. PubMed ID: 16141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Not Fear an Implant's Shape: A Single Surgeon's Experience of Over 1200 Round and Shaped Textured Implants in Primary Breast Augmentation.
Montemurro P; Cheema M; Hedén P; Agko M; Quattrini Li A; Avvedimento S
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29106482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
