BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31246806)

  • 1. What Happened after the Poly Implant Prothèse Recall? A Prospective Cohort Study of 808 Implants into the Predictive Value of Implant Rupture on Postexchange Complications.
    Kappos EA; Fitzgerald É; Haug MD; Quaba O; Quaba A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1):35e-42e. PubMed ID: 31246806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poly Implant Prothèse and Rofil Substandard Breast Implant Explantations from a Large German Single Centre from 2011 to 2014: A Comparative Study.
    Billner M; Wirthmann A; Reif S; Rieger UM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 27286854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.
    Zambacos GJ; Molnar C; Mandrekas AD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 23354761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical and diagnostic consequences of Poly Implant Prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.
    Maijers MC; Niessen FB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Mar; 131(3):394e-402e. PubMed ID: 23446590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence of rupture in poly implant Prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.
    Maijers MC; Niessen FB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jun; 129(6):1372-1378. PubMed ID: 22634654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poly implant prothèse asymmetrical anatomical breast implants: a product recall study.
    De Lorenzi F; Gazzola R; Sangalli C; Villa O; Marchetti M; Monturano M; Petit JY; Garusi C; Martella S; Manconi A; Barbieri B; Gottardi A; Iera M; da Costa Silva MA; Veronesi P; Rietjens M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25539293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.
    Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The PIP mammary prosthesis: a product recall study.
    Berry MG; Stanek JJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Jun; 65(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 22405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging screening results compared with explantation results in poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.
    Maijers MC; Niessen FB; Veldhuizen JFH; Ritt MJPF; Manoliu RA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):114e-120e. PubMed ID: 24469182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
    Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants.
    Peters W; Smith D; Fornasier V; Lugowski S; Ibanez D
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 39(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 9229086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PIP silicone breast implants: rupture rates based on the explantation of 676 implants in a single surgeon series.
    Quaba O; Quaba A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1182-7. PubMed ID: 23725742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Safety of silicone breast implants, especially of Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) breast implants].
    Hoffmann O
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2013 Feb; 155(2):50-2. PubMed ID: 23573747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonography is more useful in assessment of suspected breast implant infections rather than capsular contracture.
    Patel AJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Oct; 57(4):477-8. PubMed ID: 16998351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of Poly Implant Prothèse breast implants: the current discussion.
    Kolios L; Hirche C; Spiethoff A; Daigeler A; Lehnhardt M
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Mar; 10(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 23480085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
    Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) incidence of device failure and capsular contracture: a retrospective comparative analysis.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):906-13. PubMed ID: 23860815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonographic appearance of breast implant complications.
    Cilotti A; Marini C; Iacconi C; Mazzotta D; Moretti M; Giaconi C; Bartolozzi C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 16508351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rupture of poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants: an implant retrieval study.
    Swarts E; Kop AM; Nilasaroya A; Keogh CV; Cooper T
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Apr; 131(4):480e-489e. PubMed ID: 23249979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation.
    Hedén P; Boné B; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Walker PS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Nov; 118(6):1281-1287. PubMed ID: 17051096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.