246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31247548)
1. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.
Wear KA; Howard SM
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Sep; 66(9):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 31247548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.
Wear KA; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Dec; 67(12):2674-2691. PubMed ID: 32746206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.
Wear KA; Liu Y
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 30530327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Feb; 66(2):318-339. PubMed ID: 30530326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.
Liu Y; Wear KA; Harris GR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 28735734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.
Wear K; Shah A; Ivory AM; Baker C
IEEE Int Ultrason Symp; 2020; NA():1-4. PubMed ID: 35733623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 35133964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.
Wear K; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Int Ultrason Symp; 2020; NA():1-4. PubMed ID: 35765664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.
Wear KA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):358-375. PubMed ID: 33186102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nominal Versus Actual Spatial Resolution: Comparison of Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size for Membrane, Needle, Capsule, and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones.
Wear KA; Shah A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2023 Feb; 70(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 36178990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.
Wear KA; Shah A; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1257-1267. PubMed ID: 35143394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.
Wear KA; Shah A; Ivory AM; Baker C
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 33186103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.
Wear K; Liu Y; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Jan; 62(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 25585399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.
Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 24402896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.
Zhou Y; Zhai L; Simmons R; Zhong P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):676-85. PubMed ID: 16938956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probing acoustic fields of clinically relevant transducers: the effect of hydrophone probes' finite apertures and bandwidths.
Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1262-70. PubMed ID: 15553510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.
Wear KA; Baker C; Miloro P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Nov; 66(11):1723-1730. PubMed ID: 31352340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling of anomalies due to hydrophones in continuous-wave ultrasound fields.
Huttunen T; Kaipio JP; Hynynen K
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1486-500. PubMed ID: 14682632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental characterization of fundamental and second harmonic beams for a high-frequency ultrasound transducer.
Cherin EW; Poulsen JK; van der Steen AF; Lum P; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 12079700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.
Wear KA; Liu Y; Harris GR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Feb; 65(2):137-148. PubMed ID: 29389648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
