These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31247680)

  • 1. "Bending" and beyond: Better estimates of quantitative genetic parameters?
    Meyer K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jul; 136(4):243-251. PubMed ID: 31247680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple Penalties on Maximum-Likelihood Estimates of Genetic Parameters to Reduce Sampling Variation.
    Meyer K
    Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1885-900. PubMed ID: 27317681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of penalized maximum likelihood in estimation of genetic covariances matrices.
    Meyer K
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Nov; 43(1):39. PubMed ID: 22117894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A penalized likelihood approach to pooling estimates of covariance components from analyses by parts.
    Meyer K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Aug; 130(4):270-85. PubMed ID: 23855629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient Monte Carlo algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jul; 136(4):252-261. PubMed ID: 31247679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison via simulation of least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimators of two variances and heritability with those of restricted maximum likelihood.
    Slanger WD; Carlson JK
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 12926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating sampling error of evolutionary statistics based on genetic covariance matrices using maximum likelihood.
    Houle D; Meyer K
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Aug; 28(8):1542-9. PubMed ID: 26079756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Average information residual maximum likelihood in practice.
    Gilmour AR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jul; 136(4):262-272. PubMed ID: 31247685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of REML and Gibbs sampling estimates of multi-trait genetic parameters in Scots pine.
    Waldmann P; Ericsson T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 May; 112(8):1441-51. PubMed ID: 16544126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in Newton-type methods for restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80821. PubMed ID: 24339886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of alternative methods for estimating the precision of REML-based estimates of variance components and heritability.
    Rameez R; Jahageerdar S; Jayaraman J; Chanu TI; Bangera R; Gilmour A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Apr; 128(4):197-208. PubMed ID: 35197554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale.
    Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
    Greenland S; Mansournia MA
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of heterogeneous within-herd variance components using empirical Bayes methods: a simulation study.
    Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2824-33. PubMed ID: 1430486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of heterogeneous variances using empirical Bayes methods: theoretical considerations.
    Gianola D; Foulley JL; Fernando RL; Henderson CR; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2805-23. PubMed ID: 1430485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
    Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reparametrization-based estimation of genetic parameters in multi-trait animal model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation.
    Mathew B; Holand AM; Koistinen P; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Feb; 129(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 26582509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The empirical bias of estimates by restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models.
    Duangjinda M; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2991-6. PubMed ID: 11811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.
    Misztal I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 19134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.