These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31249804)

  • 21. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The readability of psychosocial wellness patient resources: improving surgical outcomes.
    Kugar MA; Cohen AC; Wooden W; Tholpady SS; Chu MW
    J Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 218():43-48. PubMed ID: 28985876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Readability of online sources of information regarding epilepsy surgery and its impact on decision-making processes.
    O'Callaghan C; Rogan P; Brigo F; Rahilly J; Kinney M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2021 Aug; 121(Pt A):108033. PubMed ID: 34023811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials.
    Akinleye SD; Krochak R; Richardson N; Garofolo G; Culbertson MD; Erez O
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Apr; 34(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 29287948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.
    Lee KC; Berg ET; Jazayeri HE; Chuang SK; Eisig SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 77(1):180.e1-180.e8. PubMed ID: 30296407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.
    Hansberry DR; D'Angelo M; White MD; Prabhu AV; Cox M; Agarwal N; Deshmukh S
    Emerg Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):147-152. PubMed ID: 29143222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures.
    Long WW; Modi KD; Haws BE; Khechen B; Massel DH; Mayo BC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Mar; 31(2):E146-E151. PubMed ID: 28857969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia.
    Azios JH; Bellon-Harn M; Dockens AL; Manchaiah V
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Feb; 21(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28805470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.
    Phillips NA; Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Feb; 39(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 25476602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
    Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.
    Morony S; Flynn M; McCaffery KJ; Jansen J; Webster AC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Jun; 65(6):842-50. PubMed ID: 25661679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Readability analysis of online health information about overactive bladder.
    Koo K; Shee K; Yap RL
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Sep; 36(7):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 27794197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.